To Know Them is to Love Them
Abstract
I connect the theoretical emphasis that motivated the cognitive ethnobiology of the 1960s and early 1970s with the contemporary emphasis on promoting ethnobiology as contributing to biodiversity conservation. I use the words of a popular song to highlight the necessary, if problematic, links between knowing nature – the focus of cognitive ethnobiology, loving nature, and acting to conserve nature. I argue that a highly elaborated knowledge of the living things in one's local environment is characteristic of Indigenous and other deeply rooted communities, which are dependent on sustainable harvests of local natural resources. Furthermore, this extensive knowledge goes hand in hand with a deep emotional engagement with those species (“love”), which is in turn powerful motivation to treat those species with respect, absent dominance of profit motives. I suggest in conclusion that ethnobiology may best contribute to biodiversity conservation by documenting the detailed knowledge of and cultural appreciation for biodiversity evident in such rooted communities – an effort that has defined the ethnobiological project for over the past half century. The wider community of activists dedicated to biodiversity conservation may thus better know and thus appreciate – respect, if not “love” – those who live with and depend for their livelihood on this biodiversity.
References
Anderson, E. N. 1996. Ecologies of the Heart: Emotion, Belief, and the Environment. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.
Atran, S., D. Medin, and N. Ross. 2004. Evolution and devolution of knowledge: a tale of two biologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10: 395-420.
Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Brightman, R. A. 1973. Grateful Prey: Rock Creek Human-Animal Relationships. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
D'Andrade, R. G. 1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK:
Dombrosky, J., and S. Wolverton. 2014. TNR and conservation on a university campus: a political ecological perspective. PeerJ 2: e312 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.312
Gardner, H. 1985. The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. Basic Books, New York.
Hunn, E. S. 1977. Tzeltal Ethnozoology: The Classification of Discontinuities in Nature. Academic Press, New York and London.
Hunn, E. S. 2007. Ethnobiology in four phases. Journal of Ethnobiology 27: 1-10.
Hunn, E. S. 2008. A Zapotec Natural History: Trees, Herbs, and Flowers; Birds, Beasts, and Bugs in the Life of San Juan Gbëë. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Lepofsky, D., and K. Feeney. 2013. Ten principles of ethnobiology: an interview with Amadeo Rea. In Explorations in Ethnobiology: The Legacy of Amadeo Rea, M. Quinlan, and D. Lepofsky, editors, pp. 34-46. Society of Ethnobiology, Denton, TX.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1966. The Savage Mind. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
Loev, R. 2005. Last Child in the Woods. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Malinowski, B. 1974 (1925). Magic, Science, and Religion. Souvenir Press, London.
Medin, D., N. Ross, and D. Cox. 2006. Culture and Resource Conflict: Why Meanings Matter. Russell Sage Foundation Publications, New York.
Milton, K. 2002. Loving Natures: Towards an Ecology of Emotion. Routledge, London and New York.
Nabhan, G. P. 2013. Ethnobiology for a diverse world: autobiology? The traditional ecological, agricultural and culinary knowledge of us!. Journal of Ethnobiology 33: 2-6.
Nelson, R. K. 1983. Make Prayers to the Raven: A Koyukon View of the Northern Forest. University of Chicago Press.
Nolan, J. M., and M. Robbins. 2001. Emotional meaning and the cognitive organization of ethnozoological domains. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 240-249.
Nolan, J. M., K. E. Jones, K. W. McDougal, M. J. McFarlin, and M. K. Ward. 2006. The lovable, the loathsome, and the liminal: .emotionality in ethnozoological cognition. Journal of Ethnobiology 26: 126-138.
Rozzi, R. 1999. The reciprocal links between evolutionary-ecological sciences and environmental ethics. Bioscience 49: 911-921.
Saslis-Lagoudakis, C. H., and A. C. Clarke. 2013. Ethnobiology: the missing link between ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28: 67-68.
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.
Turner, N. J., and F. Berkes. 2006. Coming to understanding: developing conservation through incremental learning in the Pacific Northwest. Human Ecology 34: 495-513.
Wilson, E. O. 1986. Biophilia. Reprint Edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Wolverton, S. 2013. Ethnobiology 5: interdisciplinarity in an era of rapid environmental change. Ethnobiology Letters 4: 21-25.
Wolverton, S., J. M. Nolan, and W. Ahmed. 2014. Ethnobiology, political ecology, and conservation. Journal of Ethnobiology 34: 125-152.
Wyndham, F. S. 2009. Spheres of relation, lines of interaction: subtle ecologies of the Rarámuri landscape in northern Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 29: 271-295.
Wyndham, F. S., D. Lepofsky, and S. Tiffany. 2011. Taking stock in Ethnobiology: Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Journal of Ethnobiology 31: 110-127.
Copyright (c) 2014 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
