Bird Names and Folklore from the Emberá (Chocó) in Darién, Panamá
Abstract
This paper presents data on names and folklore of birds collected among native speakers of Emberá in the moist tropical forests of Darién, Panamá. The naming data was collected by systematic elicitation of names from pictorial representations of birds. It is organized here to facilitate analysis of various aspects of folk taxonomy in relation to scientific taxonomy. Folklore about birds collected in natural contexts is also included to indicate the role of birds and their names in symbolic processes that exceed the limits of literal reference.References
Aguirre Licht, D. 2006. Choco Language. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition, edited by K. Brown, pp. 367-381. Elsevier, Oxford.
Bean, S. 1975. Referential and Indexical Meanings of Amma in Kannada: Mother, Woman, Goddess, Pox, and Help! Journal of Anthropological Research 31:313-330.
Berlin, B. 1973. Folk Systematics in Relation to Biological Classification and Nomenclature. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:259-271.
Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Berlin, B. 1976. The Concept of Rank in Ethnobiological Classification: Some Evidence from Aguaruna Folk Botany. American Ethnologist 3:381-399.
Berlin, B., D. Breedlove and P. Raven. 1966. Folk Taxonomies and Biological Classification. Science 154:273-275. Doi: 10.1126/science.154.3746.273
Bittner, K. 2003. Diversity of Mammals and their Uses and Perceptions by the Embera of Maje, Bayano Region, Panama. School for International Training, Panama.
Cahn, D. E. 2004. Homeless for Generations: Land Rights for the Chocoe Indians from Mogue, Panama. Fordham International Law Journal 28:232-290.
Cansarí, R. 1996. The Scientific Community and the Indigenous Emberá Community of Panama. In Protecting Biological Diversity: Roles and Responsibilities, edited by M. Kranzel, G. Seutin and C. Potvin, pp. 26-40. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Quebec.
Chapin, M. and B. Threlkeld. 2001. Indigenous Landscapes: A Study in Ethnocartography. Center for the Support of Native Lands, Washington, DC.
Colin, F. L. 2010. “Nosotros no Solamente Podemos Vivir de Cultura”: Identity, Nature, and Power in the Comarca Emberá of Eastern Panama. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Carlton University.
Conklin, H. 1962. Lexicographical Treatment of Folk Taxonomies. In Problems in Lexicography, edited by F.W. Householder and S. Saporta, pp. 119-142. Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, Bloomington, IN.
Crandell, R., ed. 2008. Emberá Stories of Panama. Translated by Rogelio Cansarí. Rainforest Press.
Dalle, S.P. and C. Potvin. 2004. Conservation of Useful Plants: An Evaluation of Local Priorities from Two Indigenous Communities in Eastern Panama. Economic Botany 58:38-57.
Dougherty, J. and C. Keller. 1982. Taskonomy: A Practical Approach to Knowledge Structures. American Ethnologist 9:763-774.
Drewal, H. J., ed. 2008. Sacred Waters: Arts for Mami Wata and Other Divinities in Africa and the Diaspora. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
Herlihy, P. 1985. Settlement and Subsistence Change among the Chocó Indians of the Darién Province, Eastern Panama: An Overview. Cultural Survival Quarterly 9:43-45.
Herlihy, P. 2003. Participatory Research Mapping of Indigenous Lands in Darien, Panama. Human Organization 62:315-331.
Hunn, E. 1976. Toward a Perceptual Model of Folk Biological Classification. American Ethnologist 3:508-524.
Johnson, A. 1974. Ethnoecology and Planting Practices in a Swidden Agricultural System. American Ethnologist 1:87-101.
Kane, S. C. [1994] 2004. The Phantom Gringo Boat: Shamanic Discourse and Development in Panama. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.; Second Edition. Cybereditions, Rochester, MN.
Kane, S. C. 1995. Emberá (Chocó) Medicinal Plant Use: Implications for Planning the Biosphere Reserve in Darién, Panama. In Yearbook for Ethnomedicine and the Study of Consciousness, No. 4, edited by C. Rätsch and J. Baker, pp. 185-206. Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, Berlin, Germany.
Kay, P. 1971. Taxonomy and Semantic Contrast. Language 47:866-887.
Kempton, W. 1978. Category Grading and Taxonomic Relation: A Mug is a Sort of Cup. American Ethnologist 5:44-65.
Lakoff, G. 1973. Hedges: A Study of Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2:458-508.
Loewen, J. 1958. An Introduction to Epera Speech: Sambú dialect. Ph.D. dissertation. Interdepartmental Linguistics. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Loewen, J. 1963a. Chocó 1: Introduction and Bibliography. International Journal of American Linguistics 29:239-263.
Loewen, J. 1963b. Chocó 2: Phonological Problems. International Journal of American Linguistics 29:357-371.
Racero-Casarrubia, J. A., C. C. Vidal and O. D. Ruiz. 2008. Percepción y Patrones de Uso de la Fauna Silvestre en Comunidades Indígenas Emberá-Katíos de la Cuenca del Río San Jorge, Zona Amortiguadora de PNN – Paramillo. Revista de Estudios Sociales 31:118-131.
Ridgely, R. 1976. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Rosaldo, M. 1972. Metaphors of Folk Classification. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 28:83-99.
Runk, J. V., M. Martínez Mauri, B. Quintero Sánchez and J. Sarsaneda del Cid, eds. 2011. Pueblos Indígenas de Panamá: Una Bibliografía. Acción Cultural Ngóbe, Panama.
Sara, S. I. 2001. A Tri-lingual Dictionary of Emberá-Spanish-English. Lincom, München.
Copyright (c) 2015 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
