Identification, Classification and Zooarchaeology
Abstract
Identification of preserved biological materials is often regarded as a skill which has little to do with analysis and interpretation. This paper argues that in zooarchaeological studies―here with particular reference to vertebrate remains―identification procedures deserve more detailed consideration, because these procedures have a significant effect on the results of faunal studies. It is suggested that most identifications are made within a system of usually unspecified rules which vary from one analyst to another. Improvements in comparability between faunal studies will result if these rules are considered before beginning an analysis, and if the rules are made explicit in publications.
References
Behrensmeyer, A. K., K. D. Gordon, and G. T. Yanagi. 1987. Trampling as a Cause of Bone Surface Damage and Pseudo-cutmarks. Nature 19:768-71.
Binford, L. R. 1981. Bones. Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Academic Press, New York.
Brown, C. L. and C. E. Gustafson. 1979. A Key to Postcranial Skeletal Remains of Cattle/Bison, Elk and Horse. Washington State University Laboratory of Anthropology Reports of Investigations 57.
Brumley, J. H. 1973. Quantitative Methods in the Analysis of Butchered Faunal Remains: a Suggested Approach. Archaeology in Montana 14(1):1-40.
Clason, A. T. 1972. Some Remarks on the Use and Presentation of Archaeological Data. Helinium 12(2):139-53.
Davis, S. J. M. 1987. The Archaeology of Animals. Batsford, London.
Driver, J. C. 1983. Minimum Standards for Reporting of Animal Bones in Salvage Archaeology: Southern Alberta as a Case Study. In Directions in Archaeology: a Question of Goals, edited by P. D. Francis and E. C. Poplin, pp. 199-209. University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary.
Driver, J. C. 1987. Review of Mammalian Osteology (Gilbert) and Avian Osteology (Gilbert, Martin and Savage). Zooarchaeological Research News 6(1).
Gilbert, B. M. 1980. Mammalian Osteology. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.
Gilbert, B. M., L. D. Martin, and H. Savage. 1985. Avian Osteology. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.
Grayson, D. K. 1979. On the Quantification of Vertebrate Archaeofaunas. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2, edited by M. B. Schiffer, pp. 199-237. Academic Press, New York.
Grigson, C. 1978. Towards a Blueprint for Animal Bone Reports in Archaeology. In Research Problems in Zooarchaeology, edited by D. R. Brothwell, K. D. Thomas, and J. Clutton-Brock, pp. 121-128. Institute of Archaeology Occasional Papers 3.
Hayden, B. 1984. Are Emic Types Relevant to Archaeology? Ethnohistory 31(2):79-92.
Hill, J. and R. Evans. 1972. A Model for Classification and Typology. In Models in Archaeology, edited by D. L. Clarke, pp. 231-73. Methuen, London.
Jeffrey, C. 1977. Biological Nomenclature. Crane Russak, New York.
Johnson, E. 1985. Current Developments in Bone Technology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8, edited by M. B. Schiffer, pp. 157-235. Academic Press, New York.
Krieger, A. D. 1944. The Typological Concept. American Antiquity 9: 271-88.
Lawrence, B. 1951. Post-cranial Skeletal Characters of Deer, Pronghorn and Sheep-goat, with Notes on Bos and Bison. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 35(3).
Morey, D. F. 1986. Studies on Amerindian dogs: Taxonomic Analysis of Canid Crania from the Northern Plains. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:119-145.
Morlan, R. E. 1986. Pleistocene Archaeology in Old Crow Basin: a Critical Reappraisal. In New Evidence for the Pleistocene Peopling of the Americas, edited by A. L. Bryan, pp. 27-48. University of Maine Center for the Study of Early Man, Orono.
Olsen, S. J. 1960. Post-cranial Skeletal Characters of Bison and Bos. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 35(4).
Olsen, S. J. 1964. Mammalian Remains from Archaeological Sites, Part I, Southeastern and Southwestern United States. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 56(1).
Olsen, S. J. 1968. Fish, Amphibian and Reptile Remains from Archaeological Sites, Part I, Southeastern and Southwestern United States. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 56(2).
Pankhurst, R. J. 1978. Biological Identification: the Principles and Practice of Identification Methods in Biology. University Park Press, Baltimore.
Ross, H. H. 1974. Biological Systematics. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Schmid, E. 1972. Atlas of Animal Bones. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Shipman, P. 1981. Application of Scanning Electron Microscopy to Taphonomic Problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 376:357-86.
Smith, G. S. 1979. Mammalian Zooarchaeology, Alaska: A Manual for Identifying and Analyzing Mammal Bones from Archaeological Sites in Alaska. University of Alaska Anthropology and Historic Preservation Cooperative Park Studies Unit Occasional Paper 18.
Sneath, P. H. and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Steward, J. H. 1954. Types of Types. American Anthropologist 56:54-7.
Sullivan, A. P. and K. C. Rozen. 1985. Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation. American Antiquity 50(4):755-79.
Van Couvering, J. A. 1980. Community Evolution in East Africa During the Late Cenozoic. In Fossils in the Making, edited by A. K. Behrensmeyer and A. P. Hill, pp. 272-298. University Press, Chicago.
Vaughan, P. C. 1985. Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Watson, J. P. N. 1979. The Estimation of the Relative Frequencies of Mammalian Species: Khirokitia 1972. Journal of Archaeological Science 6:127-37.
Whallon, R. and J. A. Brown (eds.). 1982. Essays on Archaeological Typology. Center for American Archaeology Press, Evanston.
Copyright (c) 2011 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
