Using Digital 3D Scanning to Create “Artifictions” of the Passenger Pigeon and Harelip Sucker, Two Extinct Species in Eastern North America: The Future Examines the Past
Abstract
The Virtual Curation Laboratory at Virginia Commonwealth University created 3D representations of digital morphological models, termed “artifictions,” of several bone elements from two extinct animals, the passenger pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius Linnaeus Columbidae) and the harelip sucker (Moxostoma lacerum Jordan and Brayton Catostomidae). Procuring recent comparative reference skeletons these species is extremely difficult. The creation of artifictions, 3D printed replicas of skeletal remains, aims to help researchers become familiar with the bones of harelip sucker and passenger pigeon to facilitate morphological identification of remains of these species within archaeological assemblages. Here, we discuss the two species, the techniques used to create digital topological models of individual skeletal elements, and the obstacles encountered regarding 3D printed artifictions in zooarchaeology.
References
Ahmed, N., M. Carter, and N. Ferris. 2014. Sustainable Archaeology Through Progressive Assembly 3D Digitization. World Archaeology 46:137-154.
Anderson, S. 2014. Make: Magazine Shootout Names Top 10 3D Printers. Available at: http://3dprint.com/23676/make-magazine-top-10-printers. Accessed on 11 May 2015.
Barnatt, C. 2013. 3D Printing: The Next Industrial Revolution. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Betts, M. W., H. D. G. Maschner, C. D. Schou, R. Schlader, J. Holmes, N. Clement and M. Smuin. 2011. Virtual Zooarchaeology: Building a Web-based Reference Collection of Northern Vertebrates for Archaeofaunal Research and Education. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:755-762.
Bogan, A. E. and C. M. Bogan. 1985. Faunal Remains. In Archaeological Contexts and Assemblages at Martin Farm, edited by G. F. Schroedl, R. P. S. Davis, Jr. and C. C. Boyd, Jr., pp. 369-410. University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Report of Investigation No. 39.
Chapman, H., E. Baldwin, H. Moulden and M. Lobb. 2013. More than Just a Sum of the Points: Re-Thinking the Value of Laser Scanning Data. In Visual Heritage in the Digital Age, edited by E. Ch'ng, V. Gaffney and H. Chapman, pp. 15-31. Springer-Verlag, London.
Dodson, E. O. 1950. An Available Passenger Pigeon Skeleton. Condor 52:39-40.
Driver, J. C. 1992. Identification, Classification, and Zooarchaeology. Circaea 9:35-47.
Driver, J. C. 2011. Identification, Classification, and Zooarchaeology (featured reprint and invited comments). Ethnobiology Letters 2:19-39.
Fink, W. L. and J. H. Humphries. 2010. Morphological Description of the Extinct North American Sucker Moxostoma lacerum (Ostariophysi, Catostomidae), Based on High-Resolution X-Ray Computed Tomography. Copeia 1:5-13.
Gilbert, B. M., L. D. Marin and H. G. Savage. 1981. Avian Osteology. Modern Printing Company, Laramie, MO.
Gizmodo. 2015. 3D Scanning. Available at: http://gizmodo.com/tag/3d-scanning. Accessed on 11 May 2015.
Greenberg, J. 2014. A Feathered River Across the Sky: The Passenger Pigeon’s Flight to Extinction. Bloomsbury, New York, NY.
Hahn, P. 1963. Where is that Vanished Bird? University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Heerlien, M., J. van Leusen, S. Schnörr and K. van Hulsen. 2013. The Natural History Production Line: An Industrial Approach to the Digitization of Scientific Collections. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), Marseille.
Howard, H. 1937.A Pleistocene Record of the Passenger Pigeon in California. Condor 39:12-14.
Jackson, H. E. 2005. Darkening the Sun in Their Flight: A Zooarchaeological Accounting of Passenger Pigeons in the Prehistoric Southeast. In Engaged Anthropology, edited by M. Hegmon and B. S. Eiselt, pp. 174-199. University of Michigan Museum, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jenkins, R. E. 1970. Systematic Studies of the Catostomid Fish Tribe Moxostomatini. Unpublished Dissertation, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Jenkins, R. E. 1980. Lagochila lacera (Harelip Sucker). In Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, edited by D. S. Lee, C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocult, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister and J. R. Stauffer, Jr., p. 407, North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC.
Jenkins, R. E. 1994. Harelip Sucker Moxostoma lacerum (Jordan and Brayton), In Freshwater Fishes of Virginia, edited by R. E. Jenkins and N. M. Brayton, pp. 519-523. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Jordan, D. S. and A. W. Brayton. 1877. On Lagochila, a New Genus of Catostomid Fishes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 29:280-283.
Jordan, D. S. and B. W. Evermann. 1896. The Fishes of North and Middle America: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Species of Fish-like Vertebrates Found in the Waters of North America, North of the Isthmus of Panama. Bulletin of the United States Natural Museum 47:1-1240.
Klippel, W. E. and P. W. Parmalee. 1982. Diachronic Variation in Insectivores from Cheek Bend Cave and Environmental Change in the Midsouth. Paleobiology 8:447-458.
Linnaeus, C. 1766. Systema Naturae. 12th edition. Impensis Laurenti Salvii, Holmaie, Stockholm.
Lyman, R. L. 1996. Applied Zooarchaeology: The Relevance of Faunal Analysis to Wildlife Management. World Archaeology 28:110-125.
Lyman, R. L. 2010. Paleozoology’s Dependence on Natural History Collections. Journal of Ethnobiology 30:126-136.
Lyman, R. L. 2012. Applied Zooarchaeology: History, Value, and Use. In Conservation Biology and Applied Zooarchaeology, edited by S. Wolverton and R. L. Lyman, pp. 208-232. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
Manzano, B. L. 1986. Faunal Resources, Butchering Patterns, and Seasonality at the Eastman Rockshelter (40SL34): An Interpretation of Function. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Manzano, B. L., and W. C. Dickenson. 1991. Archaeological Occurrences of the Extinct Harelip Sucker, Lagochila lacera Jordan and Brayton (Pisces: Catostomidae). In Beamers, Bobwhites, and Blue-Points: Tributes to the Career of Paul W. Parmalee, edited by J. R. Purdue, W. E. Klippel and B. W. Styles, pp. 87-92. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, Vol. 23, Springfield, IL.
McCuistion, A. 2013. Promoting the Past: The Educational Applications of 3D Scanning Technology in Archaeology. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 29:35-42.
McKechnie, I. and S. W. Kansa. 2011. Transformations in Digital Communication and Collaboration, Recent Perspectives from Zooarchaeology. The SAA Archaeological Record 11:15-18.
Means, B. K. 2015a. If They Can Build It Will They Come? Using Artifictions and Ecofictions to Teach the Past. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Conference of the Society for Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Seattle, WA.
Means, B. K. 2015b. Copycats: Casting and Molding versus 3D Scanning and Printing. The Virtual Curation Laboratory. Available at https://vcuarchaeology3d.wordpress.com//?s=copycats. Accessed on 1 August 2015.
Means, B. K. 2014. Virtual Curation and Virtual Collaboration. In Blogging Archaeology, edited by D. Rocks-Macqueen and C. Webster, pp. 121-144. Landward Research, Ltd. in Association with Succinct Research and DIGTECH LLC.
Means, B. K., C. Bowles, A. McCuistion and C. King. 2013a. Virtual Artifact Curation: Three-Dimensional Digital Data Collection for Artifact Analysis and Interpretation. Prepared for the Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program, Legacy Project #11-334. Prepared by the Virtual Curation Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Means, B. K., A. McCuistion and C. Bowles. 2013b. Virtual Artifact Curation of the Historic Past and the Next Engine Desktop 3D Scanner. Technical Briefs in Historical Archaeology 7:1-12. Available at: http://www.sha.org/assets/documents/ Technical_briefs_articles/VirtualAritfacts.pdf. Accessed on 1 August 2015.
Miller, R. J. and H. E. Evans. 1965. External Morphology of the Brain and Lips in Catostomid Fishes. Copeia 4:467-487.
Neumann, T. 1985. Human-Wildlife Competition and the Passenger Pigeon: Population Growth from System Destabilization. Human Ecology 13:389-410.
Peacock, E., W. R. Haag and M. L. Warren. 2005. Prehistoric Decline in Freshwater Mussels Coincident with the Advent of Maize Agriculture. Conservation Biology 19:547-551.
Pitelka, F. A. and M. D. Bryan. 1942. Available Skeletons of the Passenger Pigeon. Condor 44:74-75.
Richter, A., V. Petrovic, D. Vanoni, S. M. Parish, F. Kuester and T. E. Levy. 2013. Digital Archaeological Landscapes and Replicated Artifacts: Questions of Analytical and Phenomenological Authenticity and Ethical Policies in CyberArchaeology. Paper Presented at the Proceeding of the 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), Marseille, France.
Sabaj, M. H., K. S. Cummings and L. M. Page. 1997. Annotated Catalog of Type Specimens in the Illinois Natural History Survey Fish Collection. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 35:253-300.
Schorger, A. W. 1955. The Passenger Pigeon: It’s Natural History and Extinction. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Scott, E. M. 2008. Who Ate What? Archaeological Food Remains and Cultural Diversity. In Case Studies in Environmental Archaeology, edited by E. Reitz, C. M. Scarry and S. J. Scudder, pp. 357-374. Springer, NY.
Shufeldt, R. W. 1901. On the Osteology of the Pigeons (Columbae). Journal of Morphology 18:487-512.
Shufeldt, R. W. 1914. Osteology of the Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius). Auk 31:358-362.
Sims, M. E., B. W. Baker and R. M. Hoesch. 2011. Tusk or Bone? An Example of Ivory Substitute in the Wildlife Trade. Ethnobiology Letters 2:40-44.
Smith, G. R. 1992. Phylogeny and Biogeography of the Catostomidae, Freshwater Fishes of North America and Asia. In Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes, edited by R. L. Mayden, pp. 778–826. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Virtual Curation Laboratory. 2015. VCL 3D Collections. Available at http://crhrarchive.sfasu.edu/handle/123456789/53. Accessed on 11 May 2015.
Weber, J. A. and E. Malone. 2011. Exporting Virtual Material Culture: Cheap and Easy Methods to Preserve and Share Data. The SAA Archaeological Record 11:15-18.
Wolverton, S. and R. L. Lyman, eds. 2012. Conservation Biology and Applied Zooarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
Zechini, M. 2014a. Zooarchaeology in the 21st Century. Quarterly Bulletin of the Archeological Society of Virginia 69:29-36.
Zechini, M. 2014b. Rocky Raccoon: The Application of 3D Technology to Zooarchaeology. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 84:19-22.
Zechini, M. 2014c. Digital Zooarchaeology: Faunal Analysis in the 21st Century. Unpublished Undergraduate Honors Thesis in Anthropology, School of World Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Zechini, M. 2014d. Digital Zooarchaeology: Using 3D Technology on Archaeofaunal Collections. Quarterly Bulletin of the Archeological Society of Virginia 69:215-228.
Copyright (c) 2015 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.