Preliminary Starch Grain Evidence of Ancient Stone Tool Use at the Early Archaic (9,000 B.P.) Site of Sandy Hill, Mashantucket, Connecticut
Abstract
Early Archaic subsistence strategies of New England remain poorly understood despite their importance in helping researchers understand how people adapt to changing landscapes following the end of the last glacial maximum (21,000-14,000 B.P.). Excavations at the Mashantucket Pequot Reservation in Mashantucket, Connecticut during the 1990s revealed a large, semi-sedentary village nestled alongside a complex wetland ecosystem. In this paper, we present preliminary starch grain analysis of several stone tools recovered and curated from these excavations. The results of this study indicate that both transitory and reserve starch grains are preserved on these artifacts and that at least one of the artifacts may have been used for leaf or stem processing. The results of this study also demonstrate the potential for future research in which paired macrobotanical and residue analysis will allow for a better understanding of subsistence practices at the site and during the early Archaic in general.
References
Barton, H. 2007. Starch residues on museum artefacts: implications for determining tool use. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:11–11.
Chandler-Ezell, K.C., Pearsall, D.M. 2003. Piggyback microfossil processing: Joint starch and phytolith sampling from stone tools. Phytolitharien 15:2–8.
Dillehay, T.D., Ramirez, C., Pino, M., Collins, M.B., Rossen, J., Pino-Navarro, J.D., 2008. Monte Verde: Seaweed, Food, Medicine, and the Peopling of South America. Science 320:784–786.
Forrest, D.T. 1999. Beyond Presence and Absence: Establishing Diversity in Connecticut's Early Holocene Archaeological Record. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut 62:79–99.
Fuller, D.Q., Qin, L., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Z., Chen, X., Hosoya, L.A., Sun, G.-P. 2009. The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: spikelet bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science 323:1607–1610.
Hart, T.C. 2011. Evaluating the usefulness of phytoliths and starch grains found on survey artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:3244–3253.
Haslam, M. 2004. The decomposition of starch grains in soils: implications for archaeological residue analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:1715–1734.
Jones, B.D. 2006. A 3-Culture System Model for Early Holocene New England. Paper presented at the 46th annual meeting of the Northeastern Anthropological Association, Albany, NY (http://www.neaa.org/index.html).
Jones, B.D., Forrest, D.T. 2003. Life in a Postglacial Landscape: Settlement-Subsistence Change During the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition in Southern New England. In Geoarchaeology of Landscapes in the Glaciated Northeast, edited by D.L. Cremeens, and J.P. Hart, pp. 75–89. University of the State of New York, Albany, NY.
Lapham, J., Drennan, D.S.H., 1990. The Fate of Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Seed and Seedlings in Soil. Weed Science 38:125–128.
Lewis, R. 1995. Geologic History of Long Island Sound. In Ecology, History, and Recreation. edited by Glenn D. Dryer and William A. Niering. pp.12-16. Connecticut College Arboretum, Bulletin No.34, New London, CT.
McMaster, R. L., and L. E. Garrison. 1967. A submerged Holocene Shoreline Near Block Island. Journal of Geography 75:335-340.
McWeeney, L. 1994. Environmental reconstruction using plant macrofossil analysis: The Mashantucket Pequot's Cedar Swamp, Report on File, Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center, Mashantucket, CT.
McWeeney, L. 1999. A Review of Late Pleistocene and Holocene Climate Changes in Southern New England. Bulletin of the Archaeological Society of Connecticut 62:3–18.
Messner, T.C. 2008. Woodland Period Period People and Plant Interactions: New Insights from Starch Grain Analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Messner, T.C. 2011. Acorns and Bitter Roots: Starch Grain Research in the Prehistoric Eastern Woodlands. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Neff, H., Pearsall, D.M., Jones, J.G., Arroyo, B., Collins, S.K., Freidel, D.E. 2006. Early Maya Adaptive Patterns: Mid-Late Holocene Paleoenvironmental Evidence from Pacific Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity 17: 287–315.
Nicholas, G.P. 1998. Wetlands and Hunter‐Gatherers: A Global Perspective. Current Anthropology 39: 720–731.
Pearsall, D.M. 2000. Paleoethnobotany : a handbook of procedures, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Pearsall, D.M. Chandler-Ezell, K.C., Zeidler, J.A. 2004. Maize in ancient Ecuador: results of residue analysis of stone tools from the Real Alto site. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:423–442.
Perry, D., 1998. Interim report on the analysis of vegetative plant remains from sites 72-97, 72-91, and 72-66. Report on File, Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center, Mashantucket, CT.
Perry, D., 1999. Charred Vegetative Plant Tissues from Site 72-97: Preliminary Results. Report on File, Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center, Mashantucket, CT.
Perry, D. 2000. Vegetative plant remains from site 72-163. Report on File, Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center, Mashantucket, CT..
Perry, L.L. 2011. The International Code for Starch Nomenclature. Foundation for Archaeobotanical Research in Microfossils. Available at: http://fossilfarm.org/ICSN/Code.html. Accessed on February 19, 2013.
Piperno, D.R. 2006. Phytoliths : a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.
Piperno, D.R., Weiss, E., Holst, I., Nadel, D. 2004. Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature 430:670–673.
Reichert, E.T. 1913. The Differentiation and Specificity of Starches in Relation to Genera, Species, Etc., Stereochemistry Applied to Protoplasmic Processes and Products and as a Strictly Scientific Basis for the Classification of Plants and Animals. The Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington D. C.
Roberts, N., Rosen, A.M. 2009. Diversity and Complexity in Early Farming Communities of Southwest Asia: New Insights into the Economic and Environmental Basis of Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Current Anthropology 50:393–402.
Robinson, B.S., Peterson, J.B. 1993. Perceptions of marginality: the case of the early Holocene in northern New England. Northeast Anthropology 46:61–75.
Thorson, R.M., Webb, R.S. 1991. Postglacial history of a cedar swamp in southeastern Connecticut. Journal of Paleolimnology 6:17–35.
Torrence, R., Barton, H., eds. 2006. Ancient Starch Research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Copyright (c) 2013 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
