Beyond Depression? A Review of the Optimal Foraging Theory Literature in Zooarchaeology and Archaeobotany
Abstract
The use of optimal foraging theory in archaeology has been criticized for focusing heavily on “negative” human-environmental interactions, particularly anthropogenic resource depression, in which prey populations are reduced by foragers’ own foraging activities. In addition, some researchers have suggested the focus on resource depression is more common in the zooarchaeological literature than in the archaeobotanical literature, indicating fundamental differences in the ways zooarchaeologists and archaeobotanists approach the archaeological record. In this paper, we assess these critiques through a review of the literature between 1997 and 2017. We find that studies identifying resource depression occur at similar rates in the archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological literature. In addition, while earlier archaeological applications of optimal foraging theory did focus heavily on the identification of resource depression, the literature published between 2013 and 2017 shows a wider variety of approaches.
References
Broughton, J. M., D. A. Byers, R. A. Bryson, W. Eckerle, and D. B. Madsen. 2008. Did Climatic Seasonality Control Late Quaternary Artiodactyl Densities in Western North America? Quaternary Science Reviews 27:1916–1937. DOI:10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.07.005.
Broughton, J. M., M. D. Cannon, and E. J. Bartelink. 2010. Evolutionary Ecology, Resource Depression, and Niche Construction Theory: Applications to Central California Hunter-Gatherers and Mimbres-Mogollon Agriculturalists. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 17:371–421. DOI:10.1007/s10816-010-9095-7.
Campbell, S. K., and V. Butler. 2010a. Fishes and Loaves?: Explaining Sustainable, Long-Term Animal Harvesting on the Northwest Coast Using the "Plant Paradigm". In Archaeology of Anthropogenic Environments, edited by R. M. Dean, pp. 175–203. University of Southern Illinois-Carbondale, Center for Archaeological Investigations Series, Carbondale, IL.
Campbell, S. K., and V. L. Butler. 2010b. Archaeological Evidence for Resilience of Pacific Northwest Salmon Populations and the Socioecological System over the Last ~ 7,500 Years. Ecology and Society 15:17. DOI:10.5751/es-03151-150117.
Charnov, E. L., G. H. Orians, and K. Hyatt. 1976. Ecological Implications of Resource Depression. The American Naturalist 110:247–259. DOI:10.1086/283062
Codding, B. F., and D. W. Bird. 2015. Behavioral Ecology and the Future of Archaeological Science. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:9–20. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.027.
Codding, B. F., D. W. Bird, and R. Bliege Bird. 2010. Interpreting Abundance Indices: Some Zooarchaeological Implications of Martu Foraging. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:3200–3210. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2010.07.020.
Deur, D., and N. J. Turner. 2005. Keeping It Living: Traditions of Plant Use and Cultivation on the Northwest Coast of North America. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
Giovas, C. M. 2016. Though She Be but Little: Resource Resilience, Amerindian Foraging, and Long-Term Adaptive Strategies in the Grenadines, West Indies. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 11:238–263. DOI:10.1080/15564894.2016.1193572.
Gremillion, K. J., L. Barton, and D. R. Piperno. 2014. Particularism and the Retreat from Theory in the Archaeology of Agricultural Origins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:6171–6177. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1308938110.
Jones, E. L. 2016a. In Search of the Broad Spectrum Revolution in Paleolithic Southwest Europe. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
Jones, E. L. 2016b. Changing Landscapes of Early Colonial New Mexico: Demography, Rebound, and Zooarchaeology. In Exploring Cause and Explanation: Historical Ecology, Demography, and Movement in the American Southwest, edited by C. L. Herhahn and A. F. Ramenofsky, pp. 73–92. University of Colorado Press, Boulder, CO.
Mohlenhoff, K. A., J. B. Coltrain, and B. F. Codding. 2015. Optimal Foraging Theory and Niche-Construction Theory Do Not Stand in Opposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:E3093. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1507637112
Peacock, S. L., and N. J. Turner. 2000. "Just Like a Garden": Traditional Resource Management and Biodiversity Conservation in the Interior Plateau of British Columbia. In Biodiversity and Native America, edited by P. E. Minnis and W. J. Elisens, pp. 133–179. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
Piperno, D. R., A. J. Ranere, R. Dickau, and F. Aceituno. 2017. Niche Construction and Optimal Foraging Theory in Neotropical Agricultural Origins: A Re-Evaluation in Consideration of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 78:214–220. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2017.01.001.
Redman, C. L. 2005. Resilience Theory in Archaeology. American Anthropologist 107:70–77. DOI:10.1525/aa.2005.107.1.070.
Reitz, E. J. 2004. "Fishing Down the Food Web": A Case Study from St. Augustine, Florida, USA. American Antiquity 69:63–83. DOI:10.2307/4128348.
Reitz, E. J., I. R. Quitmyer, and R. A. Marrinan. 2009. What Are We Measuring in the Zooarchaeological Record of Prehispanic Fishing Strategies in the Georgia Bight, USA? The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 4:2–36. DOI:10.1080/15564890802349894.
Simms, S. R. 1984. Aboriginal Great Basin Foraging Strategies: An Evolutionary Analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Smith, B. D. 2014. Failure of Optimal Foraging Theory to Appeal to Researchers Working on the Origins of Agriculture Worldwide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:E2829. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1408208111.
Smith, B. D. 2015. A Comparison of Niche Construction Theory and Diet Breadth Models as Explanatory Frameworks for the Initial Domestication of Plants and Animals. Journal of Archaeological Research 23:215–262. DOI:10.1007/s10814-015-9081-4.
Speth, J. D. 2013. Thoughts About Hunting: Some Things We Know and Some Things We Don't Know. Quaternary International 297:176–185. DOI:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.12.005.
Stiner, M. C., and S. L. Kuhn. 2016. Are We Missing the “Sweet Spot” between Optimality Theory and Niche Construction Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 44:177–184. DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2016.07.006.
Turner, N. J., M. B. Ignace, and R. Ignace. 2000. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Wisdom of Aboriginal Peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications 10:1275–1287. DOI:10.2307/2641283.
Zeanah, D. W. 2004. Sexual Division of Labor and Central Place Foraging: A Model for the Carson Desert of Western Nevada. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 23:1–32. DOI:10.1016/S0278-4165(03)00061-8.
Zeder, M. A. 2012. The Broad Spectrum Revolution at 40: Resource Diversity, Intensification, and an Alternative to Optimal Foraging Explanations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 31:241–264. DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2012.03.003.
Zeder, M. A. 2015a. Core Questions in Domestication Research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:3191–3198. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1501711112.
Zeder, M. A. 2015b. Reply to Mohlenhoff Et Al.: Human Behavioral Ecology Needs a Rethink That Niche-Construction Theory Can Provide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:E3094. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1508096112.
Copyright (c) 2017 Emily Lena Jones, David A. Hurley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
