‘Fish’ and ‘Non-Fish’ in Lio and Nage: Folk-Intermediates and Folk-Generics in the Fish Classification of Two Eastern Indonesian Peoples
Abstract
Based on recent field research on Flores Island, this paper describes the classification of fish found among the Lio people. Formally, Lio fish taxonomy closely resembles that of the Nage of central Flores, discussed in a previous paper (Forth 2012), but differs insofar as several kinds of freshwater fish, all members of the Gobioidei, are subsumed in a named folk-intermediate taxon labeled mbo. Most attention is given to Lio names for folk-generics included in this intermediate. These correspond to the same species and genera included in a Nage folk-intermediate which, however, is unnamed. Moreover, Lio names for the component generics are clearly motivated by the same morphological and behavioral features as are reflected in Nage names for the same generics, yet the Lio names themselves are lexically quite different. These simultaneous classificatory similarities and nomenclatural differences are discussed with reference to the parts played by a common cultural heritage and natural discontinuity in the categorization of fish among these two ethno-linguistically related groups.
References
Arndt, P. 1933. Li'onesisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch. Arnoldus-Druckerei, Ende, Flores, Indonesia.
Atran, S. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Natural History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Blust, R.A. 2002. The History of Faunal Terms in Austronesian Languages. Oceanic Linguistics 41:89–139.
Forth, G. 2004. The Category of ‘Animal’ in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Ethnobiology 24:51–73.
Forth, G. 2006. Words for ‘Bird’ in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Ethnobiology 26:177–207. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771(2006)26[177:WFBIEI]2.0CO;2.
Forth, G. 2012. When is a Fish not a Fish: Questions raised by a Nage Life-form Category. Ethnobiology Letters 3:23–30. DOI:10.14237/ebl.3.2012.41.
Forth, G. 2016. Why the Porcupine is not a Bird: Explorations in the Folk Zoology of an Eastern Indonesian people. Toronto University Press, Toronto, Canada.
Hunn, E. S. 1999. Size as Limiting the Recognition of Biodiversity in Folkbiological Classifications: One of Four Factors governing the Cultural Recognition of Biological Taxa. In Folkbiology, edited by D. L. Median and S. Atran, pp. 47–69. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, and London, United Kingdom.
Hunn, E. S., and C. H. Brown. 2011. Linguistic Ethnobiology. In Ethnobiology, edited by E. N. Anderson, D. Pearsall, E. Hunn, and N. Turner, pp. 319–333. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
Kottelat, M. 1994. ‘The Fishes of the Mahakan River, East Borneo: An Example of the Limitations of Zoogeographic Analysis and the Need for Extensive Fish Surveys in Indonesia’. Tropical Biodiversity 2:401–426.
Larson, H. K. 2011. Systematics of the Rhyacichthyidae. In The Biology of Gobies, edited by R. A. Patzer, J. L. Van Tassell, M. Kovacic, and B. G. Kapoor, pp. 51–60. CRC Press, New York, NY.
Monk, K., Y. de Fretes, and G. Reksodiharjo-Lilley. 1997. The Ecology of Nusa Tenggara and Maluku. The Ecology of Indonesia Series Volume V. Periplus Editions, Hong Kong, China.
Suryati, M., and A. M. Mbete, M. Lauder, and M. Dhanawaty. 2013. Phonological and Lexical Varieties of Lio Language in Flores, East Nusa Tenggara: A Study of Geographical Dialect. e-Journal of Linguistics 6:1–27.
Verheijen, J. A. J. 1967. Kamus Manggarai I: Manggarai-Indonesia. Martinus Nijhoff, s-Gravenhage, Netherlands.
Verheijen, J. A. J. 1990. Dictionary of Plant Names in the Lesser Sunda Islands. Pacific Linguistics Series D, 83. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Canberra, Australia.
Copyright (c) 2017 Gregory Forth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
