The Words We Use and The Worlds We Build
AbstractThe Words We Use and The Worlds We Build
American Civil Liberties Union. 2017. Arizona’s SB 1070. Available at: https://www.aclu.org/issues/immigrants-rights/state-and-local-immigration-laws/arizonas-sb-1070?redirect=feature/arizonas-sb-1070. Accessed on June 28, 2017.
Color Lines. 2012. The People of Arizona Won’t Comply with Hate. June 26, 2012. Available at: http://www.colorlines.com/articles/people-arizona-wont-comply-hate. Accessed on July 29, 2017.
Mother Jones. 2010. Did Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Anti-Immigrant Zeal Kill David de la Fuente? Available at: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2010/08/sheriff-joe-arpaio-maricopa-county-sb-1070/. Accessed on May 4, 2017.
National Public Radio. 2013. In Immigration Debate Undocumented vs Illegal Is More Than Just Semantics. January 30, 2013. Available at: http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/01/30/170677880/in-immigration-debate-undocumented-vs-illegal-is-more-than-just-semantics. Accessed on May 2, 2017.
National Public Radio. 2016. Deal is Reached on Arizona's Hardline Immigration Law, After 6-Year Fight. September 16, 2016. Available at: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/16/494245921/deal-is-reached-on-arizonas-hardline-immigration-law-after-6-year-fight. Accessed on July 1, 2017.
National Public Radio. 2017. 'America's Toughest Sheriff' Joe Arpaio Goes on Trial. June 26, 2017. Available at: http://www.npr.org/2017/06/26/534381348/americas-sheriff-or-community-destroyer-joe-arpaio-goes-on-trial. Accessed on June 28, 2017.
Smithsonian Magazine. 2012. “Paradox of Liberty” Tells the Other Side of Jefferson’s Monticello. January 31, 2012. Available at: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/paradox-of-liberty-tells-the-other-side-of-jeffersons-monticello-83738466/. Accessed on July 20, 2017.
The New York Times Magazine. 2015. The Unwelcome Return of “Illegals”. August, 18, 2015. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/magazine/the-unwelcome-return-of-illegals.html?mcubz=0&_r=0. Accessed on July 29, 2017.
The New York Times. 2017. A Guide to Joe Arpaio, The Longtime Sherriff Who Escaped Strife. August, 27, 2017. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/27/us/joe-arpaio-sheriff-pardon.html?mcubz=0. Accessed on May 27, 2017.
Think Progress. 2015. The Dehumanizing History of the Words We use to Describe Immigrants. August 13, 2015. Available at: https://thinkprogress.org/the-dehumanizing-history-of-the-words-weve-used-to-describe-immigrants-18dd39c90459/. Accessed on August 1, 2017.
Copyright (c) 2018 Sophie Duncan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.