Latin American Society of Ethnobiology’s Code of Ethics

  • SOLAE Ethics Committee Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
  • Armando Medinaceli Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
  • Eréndira J. Cano Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
  • Arturo Argueta Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
  • Olga Lucia Sanabria Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1121

Abstract

Latin American Society of Ethnobiology’s Code of Ethics

Author Biographies

SOLAE Ethics Committee, Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
SOLAE Ethics Committee created the Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE) Code of Ethics, which was approved during the IV SOLAE conference in October 2015. The Code of Ethics offers ethical guidelines for all SOLAE members, researchers, indigenous peoples, local communities and organizations to carry out ethnobiological research in Latin America.
Armando Medinaceli, Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
Armando Medinaceli graduated with a PhD in the Department of Anthropology at Washington State University.
Eréndira J. Cano, Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
Eréndira J. Cano is a member of the Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE) Ethics committee.
Arturo Argueta, Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
Arturo Argueta is a member of the Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE) Ethics committee.
Olga Lucia Sanabria, Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE), Mexico City.
Olga Lucia Sanabria is a member of the Latin American Society of Ethnobiology (SOLAE) Ethics committee.

References

SOLAE (Sociedad Latinoamericana de Etnobiología). 2016. Código de Ética. Etnobiologia 14(1).

Ethnobiology Letters Cover, Volume 9, Issue 1, 2018
Published
2018-07-11
How to Cite
Committee, S. E., Medinaceli, A., Cano, E. J., Argueta, A., & Sanabria, O. L. (2018). Latin American Society of Ethnobiology’s Code of Ethics. Ethnobiology Letters, 9(1), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1121
Issue
Vol 9 No 1 (2018)
Section
Featured Reprints

Copyright (c) 2018 SOLAE Ethics Committee et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.

Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.