Does Cognition Still Matter in Ethnobiology?
Abstract
Ethnobiology has become increasingly concerned with applied and normative questions about biocultural diversity and the livelihoods of local communities. While this development has created new opportunities for connecting ethnobiological research with ecological and social sciences, it also raises questions about the role of cognitive perspectives in current ethnobiology. In fact, there are clear signs of institutional separation as research on folkbiological cognition has increasingly found its home in the cognitive science community, weakening its ties to institutionalized ethnobiology. Rather than accepting this separation as inevitable disciplinary specialization, this short perspective article argues for a systemic perspective that addresses mutual influences and causal entanglement of cognitive and non-cognitive factors in socio-ecological dynamics. Such an integrative perspective requires a new conversation about cognition in ethnobiology beyond traditional polarization around issues of cognitive universals and cultural relativity.References
Albuquerque, U. P., P. M. Medeiros, and A. Casas. 2015. Evolutionary Ethnobiology. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
Anderson, E. N. 2011. Ethnobiology: Overview of a Growing Field. In Ethnobiology, edited by E. N. Anderson, D. Pearsall, E. Hunn, and N. Turner, pp.1–14. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, NY.
Anderson, E. N. 1996. Ecologies of the Heart: Emotion, Belief, and the Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Atran, S., and D. L. Medin. 2008. The Native Mind and the Cultural Construction of Nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Barrett, H. C. 2015. Modularity. In: Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology, pp. 39–49. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5.
Bateson, G. 2000. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Beller, S., A. Bender, and D. L. Medin. 2012. Should Anthropology be Part of Cognitive Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 4:342–353. DOI:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x.
Bender, A., and S. Beller. 2011. The Cultural Constitution of Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2:67. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00067.
Bender, A., and S. Beller. 2016. Current Perspectives on Cognitive Diversity. Frontiers in Psychology 7:509. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00067.
Berkes, F. 2018. Sacred Ecology. Routledge, New York, NY.
Berlin, B., D. Breedlove, and P. Raven. 1973. General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology. American Anthropologist 75:214–242. DOI:10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140.
Bloch, M. 2012. Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Daly, L., K. French, T. L. Miller, and L. Nic Eoin. 2016. Integrating Ontology into Ethnobotanical Research. Journal of Ethnobiology 36:1–9. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-36.1.1.
Descola, P. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Ellen, R. 2006. The Categorical Impulse. Berghahn Books, Oxford, UK.
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, NY.
Gelman, S. A. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Glushko, R. J., P. P. Maglio, T. Matlock, and L. W. Barsalou. 2008. Categorization in the Wild. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:129–135. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.007.
Henrich, J., S. J Heine, and A. Norenzayan. 2010. The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:61–83. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
Hidayati, S., F. M. Franco, and R. W. Bussmann. 2015. Ready for Phase 5—Current Status of Ethnobiology in Southeast Asia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:17. DOI:10.1186/s13002-015-0005-7.
Hunn, E. 1982. The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification. American Anthropologist 84:830–847.
Hunn, E. 2007. Ethnobiology in Four Phases. Journal of Ethnobiology 27:1–10. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771(2007)27[1:EIFP]2.0.CO;2.
Hunn, E. 2018. Comment on Ludwig “Revamping the Metaphysics of Ethnobiological Classification”. Current Anthropology 59:415–438. DOI:10.1086/698958.
Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. Routledge, New York, NY.
Keil, F. C. 2013. The Roots of Folk Biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:15857–15858. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1315113110.
Kohn, E. 2013. How Forests Think. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Ludwig, D. 2016. Overlapping Ontologies and Indigenous Knowledge. From Integration to Ontological Self-Determination. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 59:36–45. DOI:10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.06.002.
Ludwig, D. 2018. Revamping the Metaphysics of Ethnobiological Classification. Current Anthropology 59:415–438. DOI:10.1086/698958.
Machery, E., and L. Faucher. 2005. Social Construction and the Concept of Race. Philosophy of Science 72:1208–1219. DOI:10.1086/508966.
Medin, D. L., N. O. Ross, S. Atran, D. Cox, J. Coley, J. B. Proffittand, and S. Blok. 2006. Folkbiology of Freshwater Fish. Cognition 99:237–273. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.12.005.
Nabhan, G. P., F. Wyndham, and D. Lepofsky. 2011. Ethnobiology for a Diverse World Ethnobiology Emerging From a Time of Crisis. Journal of Ethnobiology 31:172–175. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-31.2.172.
Rival, L. 2014. Encountering Nature through Fieldwork: Expert Knowledge, Modes of Reasoning, and Local Creativity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20:218–236. DOI:10.1111/1467-9655.12101.
Rival, L. 2018. Comment on Ludwig “Revamping the Metaphysics of Ethnobiological Classification”. Current Anthropology 59:415–438. DOI:10.1086/698958.
Ross, N., and C. Revilla-Minaya. 2011. Cognitive Studies in Ethnobiology: What Can We Learn About the Mind as Well as Human Environmental Interaction? In Ethnobiology, edited by E. N. Anderson, D. Pearsall, E. Hunn, and N. Turner, pp. 335–349. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, NY.
Shapiro, L., ed. 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. Routledge, New York, NY.
Sousa, P., S. Atran, and D. Medin. 2002. Essentialism and Folkbiology: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2:195–223. DOI:10.1163/15685370260225099.
Villagómez-Reséndiz, R. 2017. Hacia una Etnobiología Cognitiva: Tecnología Hidráulica Mesoamericana y Cognición en los Altos de Morelos. Etnobiología 15:89–98.
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2012. Cosmological Perspectivism in Amazonia and Elsewhere. HAU Masterclass Series, Manchester, UK.
Waxman, S., and D. Medin. 2007. Experience and Cultural Models Matter: Placing Firm Limits on Childhood Anthropocentrism. Human Development 50:23–30. DOI:10.1159/000097681.
Waxman, S. R., P. Herrmann, J. Woodring, and D. Medin. 2014. Humans (Really) are Animals: Frontiers in Psychology 5:172. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00172.
Wolverton, S. 2013. Ethnobiology 5: Interdisciplinarity in an Era of Rapid Environmental Change. Ethnobiology Letters 4:21–25. DOI:10.14237/ebl.4.2013.11.
Wyndham, F. S., D. Lepofsky, and S. Tiffany. 2011. Taking Stock in Ethnobiology: Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? Journal of Ethnobiology 31:110–127. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-31.1.110.
Zarger, R. K. 2011. Learning Ethnobiology: Creating Knowledge and Skills About the Living World. In Ethnobiology, edited by E. N. Anderson, D. Pearsall, E. Hunn, and N. Turner, pp. 371–386. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, NY.
Copyright (c) 2018 David Ludwig
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
