Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) and Ethnobotany for Wind River Reservation Rangelands
Abstract
The need to affirm and revitalize cultural knowledge of native plant communities is impera-tive for Indigenous people. This ethnobotanical study documents Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) structured from an Indigenous paradigm by exploring the connection be-tween plants collected in two high-elevation basins and tribal members on the Wind River Indian Reservation (WRIR). We sought to qualitatively understand the plant resources by looking through the lens of Indigenous language and perspectives. Existing names of the ba-sin plants in both the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho languages were compiled through an ethnobotanical literature review, seven in-person interviews with Eastern Sho-shone and Northern Arapaho tribal members, and attendance at language workshops. We documented 53 Eastern Shoshone and 44 Northern Arapaho plant names, respectively. His-torical impacts of past Federal Indian policy eras have shaped TEK as it currently exists within tribal communities. Both tribes used and had Indigenous names for Northern sweetgrass (Hierochloe hirta ssp. hirta), bitterroot (Lewisia rediviva), junipers (Juniperus ssp.), and bear-berry or Kinnikinnick (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi). The resiliency of TEK is attributed to the perse-verance of Indigenous people continuing to practice and teach traditions. The historical con-text specific to both the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho tribes and their languages are important for enhancing our current understanding of the ethnobotanical TEK of plants on the WRIR. Recognizing the value of ethnobotanical TEK and incorporating it into natural resource management plans and decisions can bridge diverse perspectives on land use for meaningful collaboration with tribal communities.
References
Aragon, D. 2007. The Wind River Indian Tribes. International Journal of Wilderness 13:14–17.
Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10:1251–1262. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2.
Campbell, G. R. n.d. Chapter 4: Arapaho Ethnobotany. Available at: http://theplantlady.net/resources/Arapaho%20Ethnobotany.pdf. Accessed on April 17, 2020.
Center, E. E., G. Gebow, S. S. Clair, and S. Shimkin. n.d. Eastern Shoshone Working Dictionary. Available at: http://easternshoshone.org/assets/eastern-shoshone-working-dictionary2.pdf. Accessed on April 17, 2020.
Charbonneau-Dahlen, B. K., J. Lowe, and S. L. Morris. 2016. Giving Voice to Historical Trauma Through Storytelling: The Impact of Boarding School Experience on American Indians. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 25:598–617. DOI:10.1080/10926771.2016.1157843.
Clarke, P. A. 2016. Birds as Totemic Beings and Creators in the Lower Murray, South Australia. Journal of Ethnobiology 36:277–294. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-36.2.277.
Cowell, A. 2004. Plants and Plant Names in Arapaho Life and Language. University Press of Colo-rado, Boulder, CO.
Cowell, A., A. Moss, Wa. C’Hair, and Wi. C’Hair. 2012. Arapaho Immersion School, and North-ern Arapaho elders, Dictionary of the Arapaho Language, 3rd edition. Northern Arapaho Tribe, Ethete, WY.
Cowell, A., A. Moss, and J. C. William. 2014. Arapaho Stories, Songs, and Prayers: A Bilingual An-thology. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
Davis, C. 2019. The Palouse Prairie, a Vanishing Indigenous Peoples Garden. Journal of Native Sciences 1:1–17.
Davis, A., and K. Ruddle. 2010. Constructing Confidence: Rational Skepticism and Systematic Enquiry in Local Ecological Knowledge Research. Ecological Applications 20:880–894. DOI:10.1890/09-0422.1.
Flanagan, C., and M. Laituri. 2004. Local Cultural Knowledge and Water Resource Manage-ment: The Wind River Indian Reservation. Environmental Management 33:262–270. DOI:10.1007/s00267-003-2894-9.
Fowler, C. 2009. Uto-Aztecan Languages. In Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World, edited by K. Brown and S. Ogilivie, pp. 281–284. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. DOI:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02289-6.
Holmes, M., and W. S. P. Jampijinpa. 2013. Law for Country: The Structure of Warlpiri Ecologi-cal Knowledge and Its Application to Natural Resource Management and Ecosystem Stew-ardship. Ecology and Society 18:19. DOI:10.5751/ES-05537-180319.
Kuhnlein, H. V. 2014. How Ethnobiology can Contribute to Food Security. Journal of Ethnobiology 34:12-28. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-34.1.12.
Martin, G. J. 2010. Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. DOI:10.4324/9781849775854.
Miller, W. R. 1984. The Classification of the Uto-Aztecan Languages Based on Lexical Evidence. International Journal of American Linguistics 50:1–24. DOI:10.1086/465813.
Miller, S. A. 2009. Native Historians Write Back: The Indigenous Paradigm in American Indian Historiography. Wicazo Sa Review 24:25–45. DOI:10.1353/wic.0.0018.
Moerman, D. E. 2009. Native American Medicinal Plants: An Ethnobotanical Dictionary. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Moerman, D. E. 2010. Native American Food Plants: An Ethnobotanical Dictionary. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Murray, L. G. 1996. Shoshone. In Encyclopedia of North American Indians, edited by F. E. Hoxie, pp. 586–589. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, MA.
O'Donnell, E., and J. Talbot-Jones. 2018. Creating Legal Rights for Rivers: Lessons from Aus-tralia, New Zealand, and India. Ecology and Society 23:7. DOI:10.5751/ES-09854-230107.
Pierotti, R., and D. Wildcat. 2000. Traditional Ecological Knowledge: The Third Alternative (Commentary). Ecological Applications 10:1333–1340. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1333:TEKTTA]2.0.CO;2.
Reid, M. G., C. Hamilton, S. K. Reid, W. Trousdale, C. Hill, N. Turner, and H. D. Matthews. 2014. Indigenous Climate Change Adaptation Planning Using a Values-Focused Approach: A Case Study with the Gitga'at Nation. Journal of Ethnobiology 34:401-425. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-34.3.401.
Salzmann, Z. 1960. Two Brief Contributions Toward Arapaho Linguistic History. Anthropologi-cal Linguistics 2:39–48.
Shimkin, D. B. 1947. Wind River Shoshone Ethnogeography. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United States. 1937. 299 U.S. 476, No. 216, Supreme Court of the United States.
Stamm, H. E. 1999. People of the Wind River: The Eastern Shoshones, 1825-1900. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
Trenholm, V. C., and M. Carley. 1964. The Shoshonis: Sentinels of the Rockies, no. 74. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
Walsh, F., P. Dobson, and J. Douglas. 2013. Anpernirrentye: A Framework for Enhanced Appli-cation of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge in Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society 18:18. DOI:10.5751/ES-05501-180318.
Whyte, K. P. 2013. On the Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as a Collaborative Con-cept: A Philosophical Study. Ecological Processes 2:7. DOI:10.1186/2192-1709-2-7.
Wilkins, D. E., and H. K. Stark. 2017. American Indian Politics and the American Political System. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
WSHPO. 2020. Wind River Indian Reservation Interpretive Plan for the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho. Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office. Available at: https://wyoshpo.wyo.gov/index.php/files/834/Interpretive%20Plans/1241/Wind%20River%20Interpretive%20Plan.pdf. Accessed on April 17, 2020.
Wu, X. 2015. Wild Edible Plants and Pilgrimage on Wudang Mountain. Journal of Ethnobiology 35:606–628. DOI:10.2993/etbi-35-03-606-627.1.
Copyright (c) 2020 Colleen Friday, John Derek Scasta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
