Mentoring is an Intellectual Pillar of Ethnobiology
Abstract
Ethnobiology relies on community partnerships and relationships between elders or other knowledge keepers and students. Our Society of Ethnobiology, like all academic organizations, has its own issues with discrimination and abuses of power. But more than other academic disciplines, contemporary ethnobiology is practiced with and strengthened by close, respectful working relationships. As such, we offer our thoughts on the lessons ethnobiology brings to mentorship and accountability while outlining some of the specific steps we are taking as an academic and practicing community.
References
Anderson, N. 2018. Academia’s #MeToo Moment: Women Accuse Professors of Sexual Misconduct. Washington Post, May 10, 2018, sec. Education. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/academias-metoo-moment-women-accuse-professors-of-sexual-misconduct/2018/05/10/474102de-2631-11e8-874b-d517e912f125_story.html. Accessed on December 1, 2019.
Bonta, M., R. Gosford, D. Eussen, N. Ferguson, E. Loveless, and M. Witwer. 2017. Intentional Fire-Spreading by “Firehawk” Raptors in Northern Australia. Journal of Ethnobiology 37:700–718. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-37.4.700.
Clancy, K. B. H., R. G. Nelson, J. N. Rutherford, and K. Hinde. 2014. Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault. PLOS ONE 9:e102172. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0102172.
Conradi, P. 2019. Alessandro Strumia: The Data Doesn’t Lie—Women Don’t like Physics. The Sunday Times, March 24, 2019, sec. News Review. Available at: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/alessandro-strumia-the-data-doesnt-lie-women-dont-like-physics-jl0bpfd9t. Accessed on December 1, 2019.
Fowler, C. T., and S. Herron. 2018. The Long Program for Ethics in Ethnobiology. Ethnobiology Letters 9:1–3. DOI:10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1356.
Guthman, J. 2008. Bringing Good Food to Others: Investigating the Subjects of Alternative Food Practice. Cultural Geographies 15:431–47. DOI:10.1177/1474474008094315.
Kimmerer, R. W. 2015. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis, MN.
Libarkin, J. 2019. Academic Sexual Misconduct Database. Academic Sexual Misconduct Database [web page]. Available at: https://academic-sexual-misconduct-database.org/. Accessed on December 1, 2019.
Medinaceli, A. 2018. Taking an Early Step in Ethnobiological Research: A Proposal for Obtaining Prior and Informed Consent from Indigenous Peoples. Ethnobiology Letters 9:76–85. DOI:10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1054.
National Center for Faculty Diversity and Development. 2019. Faculty Diversity [web page]. Available at: https://www.facultydiversity.org/. Accessed on December 1, 2019.
Nelson, R. G., J. N. Rutherford, K. Hinde, and K. B. H. Clancy. 2017. Signaling Safety: Characterizing Fieldwork Experiences and Their Implications for Career Trajectories. American Anthropologist 119:710–22. DOI:10.1111/aman.12929.
Randrianandrasana, M., and M. R. Berenbaum. 2015. Edible Non-Crustacean Arthropods in Rural Communities of Madagascar. Journal of Ethnobiology 35:354–83. DOI:10.2993/etbi-35-02-354-383.1.
Silvia, P. J. 2019. How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing. Second Edition. APA LifeTools, Washington, DC.
Society for Economic Botany. 2018. Code of Conduct [web page]. Available at: http://www.econbot.org/home/governance/code-of-conduct.html. Accessed on December 1, 2019.
SOLAE Ethics Committee, Armando Medinaceli, Eréndira J. Cano, Arturo Argueta, and Olga Lucia Sanabria. 2018. Latin American Society of Ethnobiology’s Code of Ethics. Ethnobiology Letters 9:86–89. DOI:10.14237/ebl.9.1.2018.1121.
Wade, L. 2019. #MeToo Controversy Erupts at Archaeology Meeting. Science, April 15, 2019. DOI:10.1126/science.aax7037.
Wadman, M. 2018. Salk Institute Settles Last of Three Gender Discrimination Lawsuits. Science, November 21, 2018. DOI:10.1126/science.aaw1383.
Wolverton, S. 2013. Ethnobiology 5: Interdisciplinarity in an Era of Rapid Environmental Change. Ethnobiology Letters 4:21–25. DOI:10.14237/ebl.4.2013.11.
Copyright (c) 2019 Andrew Flachs, Elizabeth A. Olson, John M. Marston, Andrew Gillreath-Brown
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.