Local Bird Knowledge and Practices among Traditional Accipiter Hawkers of the Black Sea Coast of Transcaucasia
Abstract
The traditional accipiter hawkers in the Arhavi district of Artvin province of Turkey and the Makhindjauri (მახინჯაური) village of Georgia were investigated to understand local knowledge and potential conservation of birds in these communities. Through free-listing, identification, pile sorting, and conducting unstructured interviews, our results revealed detailed, consistent, and specific knowledge of birds among the hawkers of both survey sites. All participants were male, as both hunting and hawking are gendered ancestral activities. Songbirds and diurnal raptors were the most common groups identified. The classification of birds was primarily functional, citing behavior and usage, especially edibility. The names of songbirds are more likely to be of non–Turkic origin, probably because of onomatopoeia, but most raptors have very functional Turkish names. We have concluded that this detailed, and consistent knowledge within the region could form a good foundation for effective and participatory conservation strategies in communication with the local hawkers.
References
Alcántara-Salinas, G., Hunn, E. S., Ibáñez-Bravo, M. E., Aldasoro-Maya, E. M., Flores-Hernández, N., Pérez-Sato, J. A., Real-Luna, N., Muñoz-Márquez Trujillo, R. A., Lope-Alzina, D., and Rivera-Hernández, J. E. 2022. Bird Conservation Status and Cultural Values in Indigenous Mexican Communities: Towards a Bioculturally Informed Conservation Policy. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 18:69–85. DOI10.1186/s13002-022-00567-z.
Alves, R. R. N., Leite, R. C. L., Souto, W. M. S., Bezerra, D. M., and Loures-Ribeiro, A. 2013. Ethno-ornithology and Conservation of Wild Birds in the Semi-arid Caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9:1–12. DOI:10.1186/1746-4269-9-14.
Arnott, W. G. 2007. Birds in the Ancient World from A to Z. Routledge, New York.
Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Taylor and Francis, London.
Berlin, B., and O’Neill, J. P. 1981. The Pervasiveness of Onomatopoeia in Aguaruna and Huambisa Bird Names. Journal of Ethnobiology 1:238–261.
Bijişkyan, M. P, 1969. Karadeniz Kıyıları Tarih ve Coğrafyası 1817–1819. H. D. Andreasyan, trans. İstanbul University Faculty of Literature Press, İstanbul.
Bignante, E. 2010. The Use of Photo-elicitation in Field Research. Exploring Maasai Representations and Use of Natural Resources. EchoGéo, 11. DOI:10.4000/echogeo.11622.
Bonta, M. 2003. Seven Names for the Bellbird: Conservation Geography in Honduras. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX.
Borgatti, S. 1995. Anthropac 4.95. Analytic Technologies, Columbia, SC.
Cheng, Z., Luo, B., Fang, Q., and Long, C. 2020. Ethnobotanical Study on Plants Used for Traditional Beekeeping by Dulong People in Yunnan, China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 16: 1–13. DOI:10.1186/s13002-020-00414-z.
Gill, F., Donsker, D. and Rasmussen, P. (Eds). 2024. IOC World Bird List (v14.1). DOI:10.14344/IOC.ML.14.1.
Harrison, K. D. 2023. Laz Words, Laz Worlds. In Lazuri: An Endangered Language from the Black Sea, edited by Z. Ünlü and B. G. Hewitt, pp. 1–8. Vernon Press, Wilmington, DE. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29652.27526.
Hull, K., and Fergus, R. 2009. Eagles in Mesoamerican Thought and Mythology. Reitaku Review 15:83–134.
Johansson, K. 2012. The Birds in the Iliad. Identities, Interactions and Functions. Doctoral thesis, Department of Historical Studies, University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Arts, Göteborg, Sweden. Available at: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/28033. Accessed on November 22, 2024.
Kikvidze, Z. and Pachulia, L. 2020. Laz Lexical Data from DR Peacock’s Collection: Representation, Reflections, Translation. Agrar Media Group, Kyiv.
Lacroix, R. 2009. Description du dialecte laze d’Arhavi (caucasique du sud, Turquie): Grammaire et textes. Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral school of Letters, languages, linguistics, arts, University of Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon. Available at: https://theses.fr/2009LYO20091. Accessed on November 26, 2024.
Ünlü, Z. and Hewitt, B. G. (eds.). 2023. Lazuri: An Endangered Language from the Black Sea. Vernon Press, Wilmington, DE.
Magnin, G., and Kurdoglu, O. 2016. Valkerij in NO-Turkije: natuurbeschermingssucces na bijna drie decennia. De Takkeling 24:221–250.
Magnin, G. 1988. Falconry and Hunting in Turkey During 1987. 1CBP Study Report 34. Cambridge, UK.
Mian, A. 1986. Ecological Impact of Arab Falconry on Houbara Bustard in Baluchistan. Environmental Conservation 13:41–46.
Minorsky, V. 2010. Laz, In Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, edited by P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. Van Donzel and W. P. Heinrichs. Brill, Leiden.
Muiruri, M. N., and Maundu, P. 2012. Birds, People and Conservation in Kenya. In Ethno-ornithology, edited by S. C. Tidemann and A. Gosler, pp. 279–289. Routledge, London.
Özdemir, A. Z. 2012. Announcement to Dictionary Preparers. Folklor/Edebiyat 18:253–261.
Pangau-Adam, M., and Noske, R. 2010. Wildlife Hunting and Bird Trade in Northern Papua (Irian Jaya), Indonesia, in Ethno-ornithology: Birds, Indigenous Peoples, Culture and Society, edited by A. Tidemann and A. Gosler, pp. 73–85. Earthscan, London.
Ploeg, J., and Weerd, M. V. 2010. Agta Bird Names: An Ethno-ornithological Survey in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, Philippines. Forktail 26:127–131.
The Hellenic Ornithological Society [web page]. Available at: https://ornithologiki.gr/. Accessed on May 11, 2025.
Van Maanen, E. R. W. I. N., Goradze, I., Gavashelishvili, A., and Goradze, R. 2001. Trapping And Hunting of Migratory Raptors in Western Georgia. Bird Conservation International 11:77–92.
Wittkower, R. 1939. Eagle and Serpent. A Study in the Migration of Symbols. Journal of the Warburg Institute 2:293–325.
Wyatt, T. 2014. Non-human Animal Abuse and Wildlife Trade: Harm in the Fur and Falcon Trades. Society and Animals 22:194–210.
Copyright (c) 2025 Özgün Sözüer, Lale Aktay-Sözüer, Refik Lakerta, Sercan Bilgin, Oğuz Kurdoğlu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
