Image-Based 3D Modeling as a Documentation Method for Zooarchaeological Remains in Waste-Related Contexts

  • Stella Macheridis Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University, Box 192, 221 00 Lund.
Keywords: Image-based 3D modeling, Field zooarchaeology, Waste-related contexts, Digital reconstruction


During the last twenty years archaeology has experienced a technological revolution that spans scientific achievements and day-to-day practices. The tools and methods from this digital change have also strongly impacted archaeology. Image-based 3D modeling is becoming more common when documenting archaeological features but is still not implemented as standard in field excavation projects. When it comes to integrating zooarchaeological perspectives in the interpretational process in the field, this type of documentation is a powerful tool, especially regarding visualization related to reconstruction and resolution. Also, with the implementation of image-based 3D modeling, the use of digital documentation in the field has been proven to be time- and cost effective (e.g., De Reu et al. 2014; De Reu et al. 2013; Dellepiane et al. 2013; Verhoeven et al. 2012). Few studies have been published on the digital documentation of faunal remains in archaeological contexts. As a case study, the excavation of the infill of a clay bin from building 102 in the Neolithic settlement of Ҫatalhöyük is presented. Alongside traditional documentation, infill was photographed in sequence at each second centimeter of soil removal. The photographs were processed with Agisoft Photoscan. Seven models were made, enabling reconstruction of the excavation of this context. This technique can be a powerful documentation tool, including recording notes of zooarchaeological significance, such as markers of taphonomic processes. An important methodological advantage in this regard is the potential to measure bones in situ in for analysis after excavation.

Author Biography

Stella Macheridis, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University, Box 192, 221 00 Lund.

Stella Macheridis is a PhD candidate in Historical Osteology, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History.


Agisoft, LLC. 2011. Agisoft Photoscan User Manual, Professional Edition, version 1.0.0: Agisoft LLC. Available at:

Berggren, A., N. Dell'Unto, M. Forte, S. D. Haddow, I. Hodder, J. Issavi, N. Lercari, C. Mazzucato, A. Mickel, and J. S. Taylor. forthcoming. Revisiting Reflexive Archaeology at Ҫatalhöyük: Integrating Digital and 3D Technologies at the Trowel's Edge. Antiquity 89:433-448.

Betts, M. W., H. D. G. Maschner, C. D. Schou, R. Schlader, J. Holmes, N. Clement, and M. Smuin. 2011. Virtual Zooarchaeology: Building a Web-based Reference Collection of Northern Vertebrates for Archaeofaunal Research and Education. Journal Of Archaeological Science 38:755-762. Doi 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.021.

De Reu, J., P. De Smedt, D. Herremans, M. Van Meirvenne, P. Laloo, and W. De Clercq. 2014. On Introducing an Image-based 3D Reconstruction Method in Archaeological Excavation Practice. Journal Of Archaeological Science 41:251-262. Doi 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.020.

De Reu, J., G. Plets, G. Verhoeven, P. De Smedt, M. Bats, B. Cherrette, W. De Maeyer, J. Deconynck, D. Herremans, P. Laloo, M. Van Meirvenne, and W. De Clercq. 2013. Towards a Three-Dimensional Cost-Effective Registration of the Archaeological Heritage. Journal Of Archaeological Science 40:1108-1121. Doi 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040.

Dell'Unto, N. 2014. The use of 3D models for intra-site investigation in archaeology. In 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage: Theory and best practices, BAR International Series, edited by F. Remondino and S. Campana, pp. 151-158. Archaeopress, Oxford.

Dellepiane, M., N. Dell'Unto, M. Callieri, S. Lindgren, and R. Scopigno. 2013. Archeological Excavation monitoring Using Dense Stereo Matching Techniques. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14:201-210. Doi 10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.011.

English Heritage, 2011. 3D Laser Scanning for Heritage: Advice and Guidance to Users on Laser Scanning in Archaeology and Architecture, Second edition: English Heritage. Available at: Accessed on October 12, 2014.

Forte, M., N. Dell'Unto, J. Issavi, L. Onsurez, and N. Lercari. 2012. 3D Archaeology at Çatalhöyük. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1:351-378.

Hill, J. D. 1995. Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: A Study on the Formation of a Specific Archaeological Record. British Archaeological Report, Oxford.

Hodder, I. 1999. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

Hodder, I. 2006. The Leopard's Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Ҫatalhöyük. Thames & Hudson, London.

Hodder, I. 2011. Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17:154-177. Doi 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.

Hodder, I., and L. Meskell. 2011. A "Curious and Sometimes a Trifle Macabre Artistry" Some Aspects of Symbolism in Neolithic Turkey. Current Anthropology 52:235-263. Doi 10.1086/659250.

Issavi, J., and J. S. Taylor. 2014. Tablet Recording Overview. In Ҫatalhöyuk 2014 Archive Report. Ҫatalhöyuk Research Project. Available at:

Katsianis, M., S. Tsipidis, K. Kotsakis, and A. Kousoulakou. 2008. A 3D Digital Workflow for Archaeological Intra-Site Research Using GIS. Journal Of Archaeological Science 35:655-667. Doi 10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.002.

Knusel, C. J., S. D. Haddow, J. W. Sadvari, and N. Dell'unto. 2013. Bioarchaeology in 3D: Employing Three-Dimensional Technology in the Field and in the Lab. American Journal Of Physical Anthropology 150:170-171.

Lyman, R. L. 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Macane, A. 2012. Fusing Osteology with Virtual Reality: Three Dimensional Morphological Differences between Harp Seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) and Ringed Seal (Phoca hispida), Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund, http:/

Marciniak, A. 2005. Placing Animals in the Neolithic: Social Zooarchaeology of Prehistoric Farming Communities. UCL Press, London.

Martin, L., and N. Russell. 2000. Trashing rubbish. In Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Ҫatalhöyük, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph, edited by I. Hodder, pp. 57-69. McDonald Institute for Archaeology Research, Cambridge.

Niven, L., T. E. Steele, H. Finke, T. Gernat, and J. J. Hublin. 2009. Virtual Skeletons: Using a Structured Light Scanner to Create a 3D Faunal Comparative Collection. Journal Of Archaeological Science 36:2018-2023. Doi 10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.021.

Orton, D. C. 2012. Taphonomy and Interpretation: An Analytical Framework for Social Zooarchaeology. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 22:320-337. Doi 10.1002/Oa.1212.

Remondino, F., and S. El-Hakim. 2006. Image-Based 3D Modelling: A Review. Photogrammetric Record 21:269-291.

Smith, N. E., and S. G. Strait. 2008. PaleoView3D: From Specimen to Online Digital model. Palaeontologia Electronica 11.

Thilderqvist, J. 2013. Ritual Bones or Common Waste: a Study of Early Medieval Bone Deposits in Northern Europe. Barkhuis & Univerisity of Groeningen, Groeningen.

Tung, B. 2013. Excavations in the North Area, 2013. In Çatalhöyük 2013 Archive Report. Çatalhöyük Research Project. Available at:

Verhoeven, G., M. Doneus, C. Briese, and F. Vermeulen. 2012. Mapping by Matching: A Computer Vision-Based Approach to Fast and Accurate Georeferencing of Archaeological Aerial Photographs. Journal Of Archaeological Science 39:2060-2070. Doi 10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.022.

How to Cite
Macheridis, S. (2015). Image-Based 3D Modeling as a Documentation Method for Zooarchaeological Remains in Waste-Related Contexts. Ethnobiology Letters, 6(2), 242-248.
Research Communications