Aspects of Honeybee Natural History According to the Solega

  • Aung Si University of Melbourne, School of Languages and Linguistics
Keywords: honeybee, Solega, Soliga, reproduction, swarming, Aristotle


Honeybees and their products are highly prized by many cultures around the world, and as a result, indigenous communities have come to possess rich and detailed knowledge of the biology of these important insects. In this paper, I present an in-depth investigation into some aspects of honeybee natural history, as related to me by the Solega people of southern India. The Solega recognize, name, and exploit four honeybee species, and are well aware of the geographical and temporal distributions of each one. In spite of not being beekeepers – as they only forage for wild honey – their knowledge of obscure and complex phenomena such as honeybee gender and reproduction rivals that of comparable, non-industrial beekeeping societies. Swarming, another hard-to-understand honeybee behavior, is also accurately explained by Solega consultants. I contrast this knowledge to that of European bee-keeping cultures, as evidenced by the writings of Aristotle and 18th century European beekeepers. This paper shows that the Solega have a reliable and internally consistent body of honeybee knowledge based entirely on brief encounters with these wild, migratory insects that are present in the forest for only part of the year.

Author Biography

Aung Si, University of Melbourne, School of Languages and Linguistics

Aung Si has training in Biology and Linguistics, and is currently a McKenzie Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Melbourne.


Aristotle. 1953. Generation of Animals, Book III. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Aristotle. 1991. History of Animals, Book IX. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Campbell, M. 2006. Busy bees: utopia, dystopia, and the very small. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 36:619-642.

Dyer, F. and T. Seeley. 1994. Colony migration in the tropical honey bee Apis dorsata F. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Insectes Sociaux 41:129-140.

Gedde, J. 1721. The English Apiary; or Compleat Bee Master. E. Curll, W. Mears, and T. Corbet, London.

Lewis, P., G. Simons and C. Fennig. 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Seventeenth edition. SIL International, Dallas.

Neumann, P., N. Koeniger, G. Koeniger, S. Tingek, P. Kryger and R. Moritz. 2000. Home-site fidelity in migratory honeybees. Nature 406:474-475.

Nonaka, K. 1996. Ethnoentomology of the Central Kalahari San. African Study Monographs Suppl. 22:29-46.

Pereira, W. and A. Gupta. 1993. A dialogue on indigenous knowledge. Honey Bee 4:6-10.

Posey, D. 1978. Ethnoentomological survey of Amerind groups in lowland Latin America. The Florida Entomologist 61:225-229.

Posey, D. 1983. Folk apiculture of the Kayapo Indians of Brazil. Biotropica 15:154-158.

Posey, D. 2002. Wasps, warriors and fearless men: ethnoentomology of the Kayapó Indians of central Brazil. In Kayapó Ethnoecology and Culture, edited by K. Plenderleith, Routledge, London.

Santos, G.D. and Y. Antonini. 2008. The traditional knowledge on stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponina) used by the Enawene-Nawe tribe in western Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 4. Doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-4-19.

Wyman, L. and F. Bailey. 1964. Navajo Indian Ethnoentomology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

How to Cite
Si, A. (2013). Aspects of Honeybee Natural History According to the Solega. Ethnobiology Letters, 4, 78-86.
Research Communications