Rivers, Fish, and the People: Tradition, Science, and Historical Ecology of Fisheries in the American West. Edited by Pei-Lin Yu. 2015. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 160 pp.
References
Armstrong, C. G. and J. R. Veteto. 2015. Historical Ecology and Ethnobiology: Applied Research for Environmental Conservation and Social Justice. Ethnobiology Letters 6:5–7. DOI:10.14237/ebl.6.1.2015.313.
Balée, W. 2006. The Research Program of Historical Ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:75–98. DOI:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123231.
Binford, L. R. 2001. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Butler, V. L. and M. G. Delacorte. 2004. Doing Zooarchaeology as If It Mattered: Use of Faunal Data to Address Current Issues in Fish Conservation Biology in Owens Valley, California. In Zooarchaeology and Conservation Biology, edited by R. L. Lyman and K. P. Cannon, pp. 25–44. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT.
Callicott, J. B. 2002. Choosing Appropriate Temporal and Spatial Scales for Ecological Restoration. Journal of Biosciences 27:409–420. DOI:10.1007/BF02704969.
Grayson, D. K. 1981. A Critical View of the Use of Archaeological Vertebrates in Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction. Journal of Ethnobiology 1:28–38.
Hayashida, F. M. 2005. Archaeology, Ecological History, and Conservation. Annual Review of Anthropology 34:43–65. DOI:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120515.
Lydeard, C., R. H. Cowie, W. F. Ponder, A. E. Bogan, P. Bouchet, S. A. Clark, K. S. Cummings, T. J. Frest, O. Gargominy, D. G. Herbert, R. Hershler, K. E. Perez, B. Roth, M. Seddon, E. E. Strong, and F. G. Thompson. 2004. The Global Decline of Nonmarine Mollusks. BioScience 54:321–330. DOI:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0321:tgdonm]2.0.co;2.
Lyman, R. L. 1998. White Goats, White Lies: The Misuse of Science in Olympic National Park. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT.
Lyman, R. L. and K. P. Cannon, eds. 2004. Zooarchaeology and Conservation Biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT.
McKechnie, I., D. Lepofsky, M. L. Moss, V. L. Butler, T. J. Orchard, G. Coupland, F. Foster, M. Caldwell, and K. Lertzman. 2014. Archaeological Data Provide Alternative Hypotheses on Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) Distribution, Abundance, and Variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:E807–E816. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1316072111.
Nabhan, G. P., M. Coder, and S. J. Smith. 2004. Woodlands in Crisis: A Legacy of Lost Biodiversity on the Colorado Plateau. Bilby Research Center Occasional Papers No. 2. Ralph M. Bilby Research Center, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Newsome, S. D., M. A. Etnier, D. Gifford-Gonzalez, D. L. Phillips, M. van Tuinen, E. A. Hadly, D. P. Costa, D. J. Kennett, T. P. Guilderson, and P. L. Koch. 2007. The Shifting Baseline of Northern Fur Seal Ecology in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:9709–9714. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0610986104.
Peacock, E., W. R. Haag, and M. L. Warren. 2005. Prehistoric Decline in Freshwater Mussels Coincident with the Advent of Maize Agriculture. Conservation Biology 19:547–551. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00036.x.
Popejoy, T., S. Wolverton, L. Nagaoka, and C. R. Randklev. An Interpretive Framework for Assessing Freshwater Mussel Taxonomic Abundances in Zooarchaeological Faunas. Quaternary International. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.09.101.
Randklev, C. R., S. Wolverton, B. Lundeen, and J. H. Kennedy. 2010. A Paleozoological Perspective on Unionid (Mollusca: Unionidae) Zoogeography in the Upper Trinity River Basin, Texas. Ecological Applications 20:2359–2368. DOI:10.1890/09-1425.1.
Rick, T. C. and R. Lockwood. 2013. Integrating Paleobiology, Archeology, and History to Inform Biological Conservation. Conservation Biology 27:45–54. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01920.x.
Szabó, P. 2015. Historical Ecology: Past, Present and Future. Biological Reviews 90:997–1014. DOI:10.1111/brv.12141.
Wolverton, S. and R. L. Lyman, eds. 2012. Conservation Biology and Applied Zooarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
Copyright (c) 2016 Jonathan Dombrosky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
