Quantitative Paleozoology
Abstract
Review of Quantitative Paleozoology. R. Lee Lyman. 2008. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Pp. 348, black-and-white illustrations. $29.34 (paper). ISBN 9780521715362.References
Broughton, Jack M. 1999. Resource Depression and Intensification during the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay: Evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound. University of California, Anthropological Records Volume 32, Berkeley.
Cannon, Michael D. 2000. Large Mammal Relative Abundance in Pithouse and Pueblo Period Archaeofaunas from Southwestern New Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19:317-347.
Egeland, Charles P. 2003. Carcass Processing Intensity and Cutmark Creation: An Experimental Approach. Plains Anthropologist 48:39-51.
Grayson, D. K. 1984. Quantitative Zooarchaeology. Academic Press, Orlando.
Grayson, Donald K. and Carol J. Frey. 2004. Measuring Skeletal Part Representation in Archaeological Faunas. Journal of Taphonomy 2:27-42.
Guilday, John E. 1970. Animal Remains from Archaeological Excavations at Fort Ligonier. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 42:177-186.
Lyman, R. Lee. 1994a. Quantitative Units and Terminology in Zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 59:36-71.
—. 1994b. Relative Abundances of Skeletal Specimens and Taphonomic Analysis of Vertebrate Remains. Palaios 9:288-298.
Nagaoka, L. 2005. Declining Foraging Efficiency and Moa Carcass Exploitation in Southern New Zealand. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:1328-1338.
Wolverton, Steve. 2006. Natural-Trap Ursid Mortality and the Kurten Response. Journal of Human Evolution 50:540-551.
Wolverton, Steve, Lisa Nagaoka, Julie Densmore, and Ben Fullerton. 2008. White-Tailed Deer Harvest Pressure & Within-Bone Nutrient Exploitation Curing the Mid to Late Holocene in Southeast Texas, USA. Before Farming 2008/2, article 3. Available at: http://www.waspress.co.uk/journals/beforefarming/journal_20082/abstracts/index.php (verified 3 August 2010).
Copyright (c) 2010 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
