Traditional Knowledge as a Basis for the Development of a Sustainable Resource Management Program: A Case Study in a Rural Village in Morelos, Mexico

  • Rubén Hernández-Tapia School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos.
  • Teresa Valverde Department of Ecology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City.
  • Abel Aranda School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos.
  • Concepción Martínez-Peralta School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-5802
  • Diana Platas-Neri School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-0974
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.9.2.2018.870
Keywords: Community programs, Ethnobiology, Environmental perception, Sustainable resource management, Traditional knowledge

Abstract

We analyzed the traditional knowledge and management of local wild fauna and flora among the inhabitants of the peasant community of Chimalacatlán, together with their perception of local environments, to identify potential species for the future development of a sustainable resource management program. Initial contact with the community was established through an ethnographic survey to identify those with the most knowledge on this topic. Residents were selected for inclusion in the interviews using chain referral sampling. Forty-eight people were interviewed and asked about the species they were familiar with, as well as their methods of fostering/managing some of them. In this context, people cited 83 plant and 44 animal species. The preferred animals for the development of a resource management program were Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer) and Ctenosaura pectinata (Mexican spiny-tailed iguana); while the preferred plants were Amphipterygium adstringens (cuachalalate) and Bursera linanoe (linaloe). For the residents of this community, fauna and flora have constituted an important resource, since various species are used as food, medicinal remedies, firewood, ornaments, and pets. Some species are illegally hunted and/or marketed as a means of subsistence. This study confirms the value of local residents’ knowledge in improving the management of environmental units, as well as the need to strengthen collaboration between decision-makers in development programs and the community.

Author Biographies

Rubén Hernández-Tapia, School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos.
Rubén Hernández-Tapia is a student in the Environmental Science Department in the School of Superior Studies of Jicarero at Autonomous University of the State of Morelos.
Teresa Valverde, Department of Ecology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City.
Teresa Valverde is a research professor in the Department of Ecology and Natural Resources at National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Abel Aranda, School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos.
Abel Aranda is a student in the Department of Psychology in the School of Superior Studies of Jicarero at Autonomous University of the State of Morelos.
Concepción Martínez-Peralta, School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos.
Concepción Martínez-Peralta is a research professor in the Environmental Science Department in the School of Superior Studies of Jicarero at Autonomous University of the State of Morelos.
Diana Platas-Neri, School of Superior Studies of Jicarero, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Jojutla, Morelos.
Diana Platas-Neri is a research professor in the Environmental Science Department and Department of Psychology in the School of Superior Studies of Jicarero at Autonomous University of the State of Morelos.

References

Biskupovic, C. 2015. From Rural Haven to Civil Political Project: Utopian Ideals and Environmental Protection in the Precordillera, Santiago, Chile. Journal of Political Ecology 22:183–198. Available at: https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21084. Accessed on December 5, 2017.

Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of Co-Management: Role of Knowledge Generation, Bridging Organizations and Social Learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1692–1702. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.

Biernacki, P., and D. Waldorf. 1981. Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods Research 10:141–63. DOI:10.1177/004912418101000205

Bohensky, E. L., and Y. Maru. 2011. Indigenous Knowledge, Science, and Resilience: What Have We Learned From a Decade of International Literature on 'Integration'? Ecology and Society 16:6–24. DOI:10.5751/ES-04342-160406.

Bohensky, E. L., J. R. A. Butler, and J. Davies. 2013. Integrating Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Science in Natural Resource Management: Perspectives from Australia. Ecology and Society 18:20–25. DOI:10.5751/ES-05846-180320.

Brandon, K., K. H. Redford, and S. E. Sanderson, eds. 1998. Parks in Peril: People, Politics, and Protected Areas. Island Press and The Nature Conservancy, Washington, DC.

Calva, J. L. 2001. México Más Allá del Neoliberalismo: Opciones Dentro del Cambio Global. Plaza and Janés, Mexico.

Centro de Educación Ambiental e Investigación de la Sierra de Huautla (CEAMISH). 1993. Resumen del programa de manejo de la Sierra de Huautla. Centro de Educación Ambiental e Investigación de la Sierra de Huautla, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad and Universidad Nacional del Estado de Morelos (CONABIO and UAEM). 2006. La Diversidad Biológica en Morelos: Estudio del Estado. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad and Universidad Nacional del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Comisión Estatal del Agua y Medio Ambiente and Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CEAMA and CONABIO). 2003. Estrategia estatal sobre biodiversidad de Morelos. Comisión Estatal del Agua y Medio Ambiente and Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. Available at: http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/region/EEB/pdf/EEB_Morelos_2003.pdf. Accessed on December 5, 2017.

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). 2012. Proyecto de Evaluación de las Unidades de Manejo para la Conservación de la Vida Silvestre (UMA) (1997-2008). Resultados de la Fase I: Gestión y Administración. Proyectos CONABIO: HV003, HV004, HV007, HV012 and HV019. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Mexico. Available at: http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/usos/UMAs_pdf/Informe_CONABIO_Proyecto_UMA_FASE_I.pdf. Accessed on December 5, 2017.

Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). 2005. Programa de Conservación y Manejo. Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de Huautla. CONANP-SEMARNAT, Mexico City, Mexico.

Durand, L. 2010. Pensar Positivo no Basta. Actitudes en Torno a la Conservación en la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de Huautla, México. Interciencia 35:430–436. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33913158006. Accessed on December 5, 2017.

Durand, L., and L. B. Vázquez. 2011. Biodiversity Conservation Discourses. A Case Study on Scientists and Government Authorities in Sierra de Huautla Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Land Use Policy 28:76–82. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.04.009.

Durkheim, E. 1968. Las Reglas del Método Sociológico y Otros Escritos Sobre Filosofía de las Siencias Sociales. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, Spain.

Fox, J., and L. Haight, coords. 2010. Subsidios Para la Desigualdad: Las Políticas Públicas del Maíz en México a Partir del Libre Comercio. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Mexico. Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Subsidios%20Para%20La%20Desigualdad.pdf. Accessed on December 5, 2017.

Galeski, B. 1977. Sociología del Campesinado. Editorial Península, Barcelona, Spain.

García, E. 1981. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Garibaldi, A., and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration. Ecology and Society 9:1–18. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1. Accessed on November 30, 2017.

Giménez, G. 1994. Comunidades Primordiales y Modernización en México. In Modernización e Identidades Sociales, edited by G. Giménez and R. Pozas, pp. 151–163. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Guzmán-Gómez, E., and A. León-López. 2014. Peculiaridades Campesinas del Morelos Rural. Economía, Sociedad y Territorio 14:175–200. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/111/11129102011.pdf. Accessed on December 1, 2017.

Haenn, N. 1999. The Power of Environmental Knowledge: Ethnoecology and Environmental Conflicts in Mexican Conservation. Human Ecology 27:477–491. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4603330. Accessed on December 1, 2017.

Heckathorn, D. 2002. Respondent Driven Sampling Ii: Deriving Valid Population Estimates from Chain-referral Samples of Hidden Populations. Social Problems 49:11–34. Available at: http://www.respondentdrivensampling.org/reports/RDS2.pdf. Accessed on December 2, 2017.

INEGI. 2015. Anuario Estadístico y geográfico de Morelos. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Mexico City, Mexico.

Kellert, S. R., J. N. Mehta, S. A. Ebbin, and L. L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality. Society and Natural Resources 13:705–715. DOI:10.1080/089419200750035575.

López-Medellín, X., L. B. Vázquez, D. Valenzuela-Galván, E. Wehncke, B. Maldonado-Almanza, and L. Durand-Smith. 2017. Percepciones de los Habitantes de la Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra de Huautla: Hacia el Desarrollo de Nuevas Estrategias de Manejo Participativo. Interciencia 42:8–16. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33949290002. Accessed on December 4, 2017.

Marques, J. 2001. Pescando Pescadores: Ciência e Etnociência em uma Perspectiva Ecológica. Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa sobre Populações Humanas e Áreas Úmidas Brasileiras, São Paulo, Brazil.

Medina, A. 1995. Los Sistemas de Cargo en la Cuenca de México: Una Primera Aproximación a su Trasfondo Histórico. Alteridades 5:7–23. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=74711352002. Accessed on December 4, 2017.

Medina, A. 1996. Prólogo. In Introducción al sistema de cargos, edited by L. Korsvaek, pp. 2–15. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Oehmichen, C. 2000. Las Comunidades Extendidas: Propuestas Para una Reflexión Antropológica. Revista Antropológicas 17:49–57.

Ortega-Argueta, A., A. González-Zamora, and A. Contreras-Hernández. 2016. The Framework and Indicators for Evaluating Policies for Conservation and Development: The Case of Wildlife Management Units in Mexico. Environmental Science and Policy 63:91–100. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.003.

Pérez-Jiménez, L. A., A. Flores-Castorena, and G. Soria-Rocha. 1992. Clave Para las Familias de Plantas con Flores de la Sierra de Huautla, Morelos, México. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología 2:25–50.

Ramires, M., M. Clauzet, M. M. Rotundo, and A. Begossi. 2012. A Pesca e os Pescadores Artesanais de Ilhabela (SP), Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 38:231–46. Available at: http://www.pesca.sp.gov.br/38_3_231-246.pdf. Accessed on December 4, 2017.

Robles-de Benito, R. 2009. Las Unidades de Manejo para la Conservación de Vida Silvestre y el Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.

Robson, J., and F. Berkes. 2011. How Does Out-migration Affect Community Institutions? A Study of Two Indigenous Municipalities in Oaxaca, Mexico. Human Ecology 39:179–190. DOI:10.1007/s10745-010-9371-x.

Rubio-Becerra, R. E. 2012. Propuesta de UMA de la Especie Phrynosoma Orbiculare en el Centro de Enseñanza Investigación y Extensión en Producción Agro-Silvo Pastoril (C.E.I.E.P.A.S.P.), de la UNAM. Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Saldaña-Fernández, C., D. I. Munévar, A. Ortíz-Sánchez, E. E. Moreno, and A. N. Aragón-Cadenas. 2007. Una Visita a la Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra de Huautla (Morelos, México). Estudios Sociales 1:189–219. Available at: http://www.publicaciones.cucsh.udg.mx/pperiod/estsoc/pdf/estsoc_07/estsoc07_189-219.pdf. Accessed on December 3, 2017.

Sánchez-Saldaña, K. 2008. Cosechas y peones en Morelos: especialización y segmentación en los mercados de trabajo rural. Análisis Económico XXIII: 201–225. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=41311449010. Accessed on December 5, 2017.

Secretaría de Marina y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). 2015. Sistema de Unidades de Manejo [web page]. Available at: http://www.semarnat.gob.mx/temas/gestion-ambiental/vida-silvestre/sistema-de-unidades-de-manejo. Accessed on November 3, 2015.

Spiegel, M. R., and L. J. Stephens. 2005. Estadística. Mac Graw-Hill, Mexico City, Mexico.

Statsoft. 2017. STATISTICA 8. Available at: http://statistica.io/products/.

Trejo, I., and R. Dirzo. 2000. Deforestation of Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest: A National and Local Analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation 94:133–142. DOI:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00188-3.

Vandebroek, I., V. Reyes-García, U. Paulino de Albuquerque, R. Bussmann, and A. Pieroni. 2011. Local Knowledge: Who Cares? Journal of Ethnobiological Ethomedicine 7:1–7. DOI:10.1186/1746-4269-7-35.

Weber, M., G. García-Marmolejo, and R. Reyna-Hurtado. 2006. The Tragedy of the Commons: Wildlife Management Units in Southeastern Mexico. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34:1480–1488. DOI:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1480:TTOTCW]2.0.CO;2.

Chimalacatlan
Published
2018-04-09
How to Cite
Hernández-Tapia, R., Valverde, T., Aranda, A., Martínez-Peralta, C., & Platas-Neri, D. (2018). Traditional Knowledge as a Basis for the Development of a Sustainable Resource Management Program: A Case Study in a Rural Village in Morelos, Mexico. Ethnobiology Letters, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.9.2.2018.870
Issue
Vol 9 No 2 (2018)
Section
Research Communications

Copyright (c) 2018 Rubén Hernández-Tapia, Teresa Valverde, Abel Aranda, Concepción Martínez-Peralta, Diana Platas-Neri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.

Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.