Toponymic Data Helps to Reveal the Occurrence of Previously Unknown Populations of Wild Zamia pumila L. on Volcanic Substrates in South Central Puerto Rico
Abstract
This is the first report of the occurrence of wild Zamia pumila L. Zamiaceae populations on various volcanic substrates in the piedmont area of south central Puerto Rico. Data acquisition and its field confirmation were possible after the identification of toponymic names in old and current maps, and historic documents of the island in which one of the indigenous names for the genus (marunguey [marungüey] or marungueyes) has been used for naming some localities. These preliminary data have deep implications for paleo- and neoethnobotanical research, and for population ecology of the species in Puerto Rico, because they expand the traditionally accepted range for the species on the island. Zamia has been described as one of the main food plants among pre- and post-Columbian inhabitants in two islands of the Greater Antilles, Hispaniola and Puerto Rico, where the most sophisticated pre-Columbian society of the Antilles, the Taínos, emerged. Our findings suggest that Zamia might have been more available to humans, as a food source, than previously thought.
References
Abbad y Lasierra, F. I. 2002. Historia Geográfica, Civil y Natural de la Isla de San Juan Bautista de Puerto Rico. Ediciones Doce Calles, Madrid.
Acevedo, P., and M. Strong. 2005. Zamiaceae. In Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, edited by P. Acevedo and M. Strong, pp. 14-17. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, Volume 52: 1-415. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC.
Axelrod, F. S. 2011. A Systematic Vademecum to the Vascular Plants of Puerto Rico. SIDA, Botanical Miscellany Number 34: 1-420. BRIT Press, Fort Worth.
Balée, W. 2006. The Research Program of Historical Ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:1–24.
Caputo , P., S. Cozzolino, P. de Luca, A. Moretti and D. W. Stevenson. 2004. Molecular Phylogeny of Zamia (Zamiaceae). In Cycad Classification. Concepts and Recommendations, edited by T. Walters and R. Osborne, pp. 149-158. CABI Publishing, Oxford.
Córdova, P. T. 1831. Memorias Geográficas, Históricas, Económicas y Estadísticas de la Isla de Puerto Rico. Oficina del Gobierno a cargo de D. Valeriano de Sanmillán, Madrid.
Eckenwalder, J. E. 1980. Taxonomy of the West Indian Cycads. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 61:701-722.
Erhard, G. C. 1861. Carte de l’ Ile de Saint Jean de Puerto-Rico. Bulletin de la Société de Geographie 5.
Erickson, C. L. 2008. Amazonia: The Historical Ecology of a Domesticated Landscape. In Handbook of South American Archaeology, edited by H. Silverman and W. H. Isbell, pp. 157-183. Springer, NY.
González-Géigel, L. 2003. Zamiaceae. In Flora de la República de Cuba. Fascículo 8(4). A.R. Ganter Verlag KG, Liechtenstein.
Google Earth. 2012. Google Earth Version 6.1.0.5001. Server kh.google.com, Mountain View, CA.
Kaye, C. A. 1959. Coastal Geology of Puerto Rico. US Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Professional Paper 317, Washington DC.
Krushensky, R. D. 1998. Geologic Map of Puerto Rico with Correlation Chart and Map Unit Descriptions. In Geology, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Mineral Occurrences and Mineral Resource Assessment for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, edited by W. Bawiec. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-38, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-38/.
Lansing, S., and M. P. Cox. 2011. The Domain of the Replicators. Current Anthropology 52(1):105-125.
Las Casas, B. de. 1909. Apologética Historia de las Indias. Nueva Biblioteca de Autores Españoles 13, Madrid.
Meerow, A. W., D. Stevenson, J. Moynihan and J. Francisco-Ortega. 2007. Unlocking the Coontie Conundrum: The Potential of Microsatellite DNA Studies in the Caribbean Zamia pumila Complex (Zamiaceae). Memories of the New York Botanical Garden 98: 484-518.
Meerow, A. W., J. Francisco-Ortega, M. Calonje, M. Patrick Griffith, T. Ayala-Silva, D. W. Stevenson and K. Nakamura. 2012. Zamia (Cycadales: Zamiaceae) on Puerto Rico: Asymmetric Genetic Differentiation and the Hypothesis of Multiple Introductions. American Journal of Botany 99(11):1828-1839.
Mickleburgh, H. and J. R. Pagán-Jiménez. 2012. New Insights Into the Consumption of Maize and Other Food Plants in the Pre-Columbian Caribbean from Starch Grains Trapped in Human Dental Calculus. Journal of Archaeological Science 39:2468-2478.
Norstog, K. and T. J. Nicholls. 1997. The Biology of the Cycads. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Pagán-Jiménez, J. R. 2007. De Antiguos Pueblos y Culturas Botánicas en el Puerto Rico Indígena. Paris Monographs in American Archaeology 18/British Archaeological Reports International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford.
Pagán-Jiménez, J. R. 2009. Nuevas Perspectivas Sobre las Culturas Botánicas Precolombinas de Puerto Rico: Implicaciones del Estudio de almidones en Herramientas Líticas, Cerámicas y de Concha. Cuba Arqueológica II(2):7-23.
Pagán-Jiménez, J. R. 2011. Early Phyto-Cultural Processes in the Precolonial Antilles: A Pan-Caribbean Survey for an Ongoing Starch Grain Research. In Communities in Contact. Essays in Archaeology, Ethnohistory and Ethnography of the Amerindian Circum-Caribbean, edited by C. L. Hofman and A. van Duijvenbode, pp. 87-116. Sidestone Press, Leiden.
Pagán-Jiménez, J. R. 2013. Human-Plant Dynamics in the Precolonial Antilles: A Synthetic Update. In The Oxford Handbook of Caribbean Archaeology, edited by W. Keegan, C. L. Hofman and R. Rodríguez-Ramos, pp. 391-406. Oxford University Press, NY.
Smith, B. D. 2011. General Patterns of Niche Construction and the Management of Wild Plant and Animal Resources by Small-Scale Pre-Industrial Societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 366:836-848.
Stevenson, D. W. 1987. Again the West Indian Zamias. Fairchild Tropical Garden Bulletin 42(3):23-27.
Stevenson, D. W., A. Vovides and J. Chemnick. 2003. Regional Overview: New World. In Cycads. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, edited by J. Donaldson, pp. 31-38. The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
Veloz Maggiolo, M. 1992. Notas sobre la Zamia en la Prehistoria del Caribe. Revista de Arqueología Americana 6:125-138.
Web Soil Survey. 2012. Puerto Rico. Available at: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/. Accessed on May 24, 2012.
Whitelock, L. M. 2002. The Cycads. Timber Press, Portland.
Copyright (c) 2013 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
