Beings of a Feather: Learning About the Lives of Birds with Amazonian Peoples
Abstract
This article is a memoir of the author's fieldwork experiences studying traditional knowledge of bird species in the Peruvian Amazon. It describes his growth as a researcher, in light of the practical and methodological challenges of carrying out this kind of work. It also relates how the author's thinking has evolved on questions of current theoretical interest in ethnobiology. The first section outlines how the author came to be interested in this topic while pursuing an ethnobotanical dissertation project. Next, the discussion follows his work with the indigenous Aguaruna and Iquito peoples, learning about and documenting their understandings of the nesting, foraging and reproductive behavior of local avian species. On one hand, he found that local people provided details of these behaviors that match, in many ways, the counts of academic ornithologists. However, local interpretations of why these behaviors take place are often framed by some very different assumptions. The author uses Victor Toledo's tripartite framework of kosmos (overarching belief systems), corpus (cognitive categories), and praxis (set of practices) to discuss similarities and differences in Aguaruna, Iquito, and academic ornithology. He also discusses his progression of views on the topic of perspectivism and eventual preference for a theoretical framework favoring a polyontological approach to understanding Amazonian ethnoecology.References
Beier, C. and L. Michael. 2002. La Condición Actual del Idioma Indígena Iquito y las Claves Factores Afectando al Proyecto de su Recuperación. Available at: http://www.cabeceras.org/Iquito_Informe_2002.pdf. Accessed on 6/14/2016.
Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Animals and Plants in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Berlin B., J. S. Boster, J. P. O'Neill. 1981. The Perceptual Bases of Ethnobiological Classification: Evidence from Aguaruna Jivaro Ornithology Journal of Ethnobiology 1:95–108.
Davies, C. W. N., R. Barnes, S. H. M. Butchard, M. Fernandez and N. Seddon. 1997. The Conservation Status of the Cordillera de Colán. Bird Conservation International 7:181–195. DOI:10.1017/s0959270900001490
Holbraad, M., and R. Willerslev. 2007. Transcendental Perspectivism: Anonymous Viewpoints from Inner Asia. Inner Asia 9:329–345. DOI: 10.1163/146481707793646511.
Hunn, E. 1982. The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification. American Anthropologist 84:830-847. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1982.84.4.02a00070.
Jernigan, K. 2006. An Ethnobiological Exploration of Sensory and Ecological Aspects of Tree Identification among the Aguaruna Jívaro. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens. Available at: https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/jernigan_kevin_a_200605_phd.pdf. Accessed on 11/3/2016.
Jernigan, K. 2006. An Ethnobotanical Investigation of Tree Identification by the Aguaruna Jívaro of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnobiology 26:107–125. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771(2006)26[107:aeioti]2.0.co;2.
Jernigan, K. and N. Dauphine. 2008. Aguaruna Knowledge of Bird Foraging Ecology: A Comparison with Scientific Data. Ethnobotany Research and Applications. 6:93–106. DOI:10.17348/era.6.0.93-106.
Kirksey, S. and S. Helmreich. 2010. The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25:545–576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
Kohn, E. O. 2005. Runa Realism: Upper Amazonian Attitudes to Nature Knowing. Ethnos 70:171–196. DOI: 10.1080/00141840500141162.
Latour, B. 2009. Perspectivism:‘Type’or ‘Bomb’?”. Anthropology Today 25:1–2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00652.x.
Lowery, G. H. and J. P. O’Neill. 1964. A New Genus and Species of Tanager from Peru. The Auk 81:125–131. DOI:10.2307/4082763.
Schulenberg, T. S., D. F. Stolz, D. R. Lang, J. P. O'Neill, and T. A. Parker. 2007. Birds of Peru Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Shepard, Glenn. 2014. “Old and in the Way: Jaguar Transformation in Matisgenka.” In IX Sesquiannual Conference of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America (SALSA) Gothenburg, Sweden, June, 26–29. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/15538299/Old_and_in_the_way_Jaguar_transformation_in_Matsigenka. Accessed on 11/3/2016.
Sick, H. 1993. Birds in Brazil: A Natural History. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Toledo, V. M. 2002. Ethnoecology: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Indigenous Knowledge of Nature. In Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity, edited by J. R. Stepp, F. S. Wyndham, and R. K. Zarger, pp. 511–522. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.
Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4:469–488. DOI: 10.2307/3034157.
Copyright (c) 2016 Kevin Jernigan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
