Analysis of Starch Grains Produced in Select Taxa Encountered in Southwest Asia
Starch grain analysis is a rapidly growing field of research in Southwest Asia and is beginning to be applied to many different time periods. However, much work still remains regarding which taxa produce starch grains that can be identified archaeologically. In this paper, I centralize what is known about starch production patterns within regional flora and analyze 64 previously unstudied taxa from 22 families. The results of this study demonstrate that descriptions of starch grains from Southwest Asian taxa are scattered between archaeological and plant and food science publications. Ten of the species examined in this study, most of whom are grasses, produced starch grains that can be identified at varying taxonomic levels.
Balbo, A.L.A., Iriarte, E.E., Arranz, A.A., Zapata, L.L., Lancelotti, C.C., Madella, M.M., Teira, L.L., Jiménez, M.M., Braemer, F.F., Ibáñez, J.J.J., 2012. Squaring the circle. Social and environmental implications of pre-pottery neolithic building technology at Tell Qarassa (South Syria). PLoS One 7, e42109–e42109.
Cummings, L.S., Magennis, A., 1997. A phytolith and starch record of food and grit in Mayan human tooth tartar, in: Pinilla, A., Juan-Tresserras, J., Machado, M.J. (Eds.), Estado Actual De Los Esudios De Fitolitos en Suelos Y Plantas. Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, Madrid, pp. 211–218.
Davis, P.H. (Ed.), 1965. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol 1. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Duncan, N.A., Pearsall, D.M., Benfer, R.A., Jr, 2009. Gourd and squash artifacts yield starch grains of feasting foods from preceramic Peru. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 13202–13206.
Ge, W., Liu, L., Chen, X., Zhengyao, J., 2010. Can Noodles Be Made From Millet? an Experimental Investigation of Noodle Manufacture Together with Starch Grain Analyses. Archaeometry 53, 194–204.
Gott, B., Barton, H., Samuel, D., Torrence, R., 2006. Biology of starch, in: Torrence, R., Barton, H. (Eds.), Ancient Starch Research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 35–45.
Haslam, M., 2004. The decomposition of starch grains in soils: implications for archaeological residue analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 1715–1734.
Hather, J.G., 1991. The identification of charred archaeological remains of vegetative parenchymous tissue. Journal of Archaeological Science 18, 661–675.
Hather, J.G., 1993. An Archaeobotanical Guide to Root and Tuber Identification: Europe and South West Asia. Oxbow Books Limited.
Henry, A.G., Brooks, A.S., Piperno, D.R., 2011. Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 486–491.
Henry, A.G., Hudson, H.F., Piperno, D.R., 2009. Changes in starch grain morphologies from cooking. Journal of Archaeological Science 36, 915–922.
Henry, A.G., Piperno, D.R., 2008. Using plant microfossils from dental calculus to recover human diet: a case study from Tell al-Raqā'i, Syria. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 1943–1950.
Horrocks, M., Irwin, G., Jones, M., Sutton, D., 2004. Starch grains and xylem cells of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and bracken (Pteridium esculentum) in archaeological deposits from northern New Zealand. Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 251–258.
ICSN, 2014. The International Code for Starch Nomenclature [WWW Document]. Foundation for Archaeobotanical Research in Microfossils. URL http://fossilfarm.org/ICSN/Code.html (accessed 2.19.14).
Kennett, D., Kennett, J., 2006. Early State Formation in Southern Mesopotamia: Sea Levels, Shorelines, and Climate Change. The Journal of Island & Coastal Archaeology 1, 67–99.
Li, M., Yang, X.X., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Jia, X., Ge, Q., 2010. Starch grains from dental calculus reveal ancient plant foodstuffs at Chenqimogou site, Gansu Province. Science China Earth Sciences 53, 694–699.
Messner, T.C., 2008. Woodland Period Period People and Plant Interactions: New Insights from Starch Grain Analysis. Temple University, Philadelphia.
Messner, T.C., 2011. Acorns and Bitter Roots: Starch Grain Research in the Prehistoric Eastern Woodlands. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Migahid, Ahmed Mohammed. 1988. Flora of Saudi Arabia, Vol 1., King Saud University, Riyadh.
Parr, J.F., Carter, M., 2003. Phytolith and starch analysis of sediment samples from two archaeological sites on Dauar Island, Torres Strait, northeastern Australia. Vegetetation History Archaeobotany 12, 131–141.
Pearsall, D.M., 2000. Paleoethnobotany: a handbook of procedures, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.
Perry, L.L., 2004. Starch analyses reveal the relationship between tool type and function: an example from the Orinoco valley of Venezuela. Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 1069–1081.
Piperno, D.R., Dillehay, T.D., 2008. Starch grains on human teeth reveal early broad crop diet in northern Peru. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 19622–19627.
Piperno, D.R., Ranere, A.J., Holst, I., Hansell, P., 2000. Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest. Nature 407, 894–897.
Piperno, D.R., Weiss, E., Holst, I., Nadel, D., 2004. Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature 430, 670–673.
Riehl, S., 1999. Bronze Age Environment and Economy in the Troad. Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen.
Reichert, E.T., 1913. The Differentiation and Specificity of Starches in Relation to Genera, Species, Etc., Stereochemistry Applied to Protoplasmic Processes and Products and as a Strictly Scientific Basis for the Classification of Plants and Animals. The Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington D. C.
Rosen, A.M., 2005. Phytolith indicators of plant and land use at Çatalhöyük, in: Hodder, I. (Ed.), Inhabiting Çatalhöyük; Reports From the 1995–99 Seasons. McDonald Institute of Archaeology, Cambridge, pp. 203–212.
Ryan, P., 2011. Plants as material culture in the Near Eastern Neolithic: Perspectives from the silica skeleton artifactual remains at Çatalhöyük. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 30, 292–305.
Samuel, D., 1996. Investigation of Ancient Egyptian Baking and Brewing Methods by Correlative Microscopy. Science 273, 488–490.
Sivak, M.N.S., Preiss, J. (Eds.), 1998. Starch: Basic Science to Biotechnology. Academic Press, San Diego.
Tester, R.F., Karkalas, J., Qi, X., 2004. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. Journal of Cereal Science 39, 151–165.
Torrence, R., Barton, H. (Eds.), 2006. Ancient starch research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Wollstonecroft, M.M., Ellis, P.R., Hillman, G.C., Fuller, D.Q., 2008. Advances in plant food processing in the Near Eastern Epipalaeolithic and implications for improved edibility and nutrient bioaccessibility: an experimental assessment of Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla (sea club-rush). Vegetetation History Archaeobotany 17, 19–27.
Yang, X.X., Perry, L.L., 2013. Identification of ancient starch grains from the tribe Triticeae in the North China Plain. Journal of Archaeological Science 40, 3170–3177.
Zohary, D., Hopf, M., Weiss, E., 2012. Domestication of Plants in the Old World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Copyright (c) 2014 Ethnobiology Letters
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.