Bird Stories from Latin America: Lessons on Change and Adaptation
Abstract
When people hear bird sounds, they understand them on various levels that are interpreted according to cultural context. Among Indigenous cultures of Latin America, avian voices are understood in relation to group identity, kinship affiliation, and personal experience, such as dreams and vision quests. Birds are recognized as social actors with their own voices that express intentions, desires, needs, and responsibilities. Certain birds may impart messages to specific people, and stories of these personal interactions represent both traditional values as well as individual explanations for what the bird communicated. These experiences are incorporated into the dynamic relationships people have with birds, the ancestors, the landscape, and spirit beings, and assist in addressing both cultural and climatic changes. This essay presents stories from Mexico, Costa Rica, and Peru, and shows how individuals interpret bird communications according to cultural values that relate to their personal situation. These avian messages gain new meaning and urgency during periods of dramatic change, like the current climate crisis. As people seek creative responses to survive, relationships with birds provide resiliency.
References
Bastien, J. W. 1985. Qollahuaya-Andean Body Concepts: A Topographical-Hydraulic Model of Physiology. American Anthropologist 87:595–611.
Bonatti, J. G. 2003. El Zopilote: Caquero y Psicopompo. II Congreso Sobre Pueblos Indígenas. Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Camilleri, A. 2007. The Patience of the Spider: An Inspector Montalbano Mystery. S. Sartarelli, trans. Penguin, New York, NY. Originally Published in Italian, Pazienza del Ragno. 2004. Sellerio Editore, Palermo, Italy.
Bozzoli Vargas, M., C. Cubero Venegas, M. Sánchez Perreira, A. Calderón Saravia, and J. Segundo Sánchez. 1982. Tradición Oral Indígena Costarricense, Relatos Bribris de Kekoldi, Provincia de Limón. Volumen IV, Año IC, Número 1–2. Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Cruz Jacinto, M. A., M. A. Vásquez–Dávila, P. Colunga García–Marín, and M. P. Jerez Salas. 2014. Aspectos Etnoecológicos de la Ornitofauna Entre los Ikoot de San Mateo del Mar, Oaxaca, México. In Aves, Personas y Culturas. Estudios de Etno–ornitología 1, edited by M. A. Vásquez–Dávila, pp. 151–167. CONACYT/ITVO/Carteles Editores/UTCH, Oaxaca, México.
Fernández, P. E., and J. Sánchez. 2009. Aves de Piedra, Barro y Oro en la Costa Rica Precolombina/ Birds of Stone, Clay and Gold in pre-Columbian Costa Rica. Fundación Museos del Banco Central, San José, Costa Rica.
Filloy Nadal, L. 2019. De la Pluma y Sus Usos en Mesoamérica. Arqueología Mexicana 159:18–23.
Flores-Marcia, X. M. 2015. A History of Guelaguetza in Zapotec Communities of the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, 16th Century to the Present. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Available at: https://escholarship.org/content/qt7tv1p1rr/qt7tv1p1rr.pdf. Accessed on April 24, 2020.
Garibaldi, A., and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration. Ecology and Society 9:1. DOI:10.5751/es-00669-090301.
Giuntini, C. 2006. Precolumbian and Ethnographic Featherwork from the Andes and Amazon in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos 1457. DOI:10.4000/nuevomundo.1457.
Goodman, A. 2019. COP25 Was a Failure, But Activists’ Collective Organizing at the Talks Was Unprecedented. Democracy Now. [web page]. Available at: https://www.democracynow.org/2019/12/16/cop25_failure_asad_rehman_tasneem_essop. Accessed on December 16, 2019.
Granadino, C., ed. 1993. Cuentos de Nuestros Abuelos Quechuas: Recuperando La Tradición Oral (Stories of Our Quechua Grandparents: Recovering Oral Tradition (my translation). WASAPAY, Lima, Perú.
Guevara Berger, M. 2004. Por una Epistemología Nuestra: Política y Antropología, Desde los Bribris. Anales de Antropología 38:201–228. DOI:10.22201/iia.24486221e.2004.1.16590.
Guirao-Cruz, R. E., L. Gamay, and S. L. Arriaga-Weiss. 2014. Aproximación a la Cosmovisión y al Conocimiento Zoque Sobre el Quetzal (Pharomachrus mocinno) en Tapalapa, Chiapas, México. In Aves, Personas y Culturas. Estudios de Etno–ornitología 1, edited by M. A. Vásquez–Dávila, pp. 107–117. CONACYT/ ITVO/Carteles Editores/UTCH, Oaxaca, México.
Hull, K., and R. Fergus. 2017. Birds as Seers: An Ethno-Ornithological Approach to Omens and Prognostication Among the Ch'Orti' Maya of Guatemala. Journal of Ethnobiology 37:604–620. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-37.4.604.
Jara Jiménez, C. 1990. Don Rómulo Ramirez, Cazador de Cóndores (Don Romulo Ramirez, Hunter of Condors). CIPCA: Centro de Investigacion y promocion del Campesinado, Serie: Cuentos Piuranos no. 5, Miraflores, Peru.
Kane, S. 2015. Bird Names and Folklore from the Emberá (Chocó) in Darién, Panamá. Ethnobiology Letters 6:32–62. DOI:10.14237/ebl.6.1.2015.226.
Lambert, J. 2019. We’ve Lost 3 Billion Birds Since 1970 in North America. Science News. Available at: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/3-billion-birds-lost-since-1970-north-america. Published on September 19, 2019.
Little Bear, L. 2019. Jagged Worldviews Colliding. Walking Together: First Nations, Métis and Inuit Perspectives in Curriculum. Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Available at: http://www.learnalberta.ca/content/aswt/worldviews/documents/jagged_worldviews_colliding.pdf. Accessed on July 16, 2020.
March, C. 1898. The Mythology of Wise Birds. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 27:209–232.
O’Brien Lyver, P., and H. Moller. 2010. An Alternative Reality: Maori Spiritual Guardianship of New Zealand’s Native Birds. In Ethno-ornithology: Birds, Indigenous Peoples, Culture and Society, edited by S. Tideman and A. Gosler, pp. 241–264. Earthscan Ltd., London, England.
Palmer, P., J. Sánchez, and G. Mayorga. 1992. Vías de extinción, Vías de supervivencia: Testimonios del Pueblo Indígena de la Reserva KéköLdi, Costa Rica. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Sánchez, J. 1996–1997. Relatos Bribris de Kekoldi, Provincia de Limón, Costa Rica. Tradición Oral Indígena Costarricense 4:1–83.
Sánchez Garrafa, R. 2005. Apus de los Cuatro Suyos: Construcción del Mundo en los Ciclos Mitológicos de las Deidades Montaña. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. Available at: http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/cybertesis/2749. Accessed on June 15, 2016.
Sánchez Pereira, M., and M. E. Bozzoli Vargas. 1997–1998. Motivos Faunísticos en la Cultura Indígena Costarricense. Estudios de Lingüística Chibcha: Tomo 16:113–144.
Sault, N. 2010. Bird Messengers for All Seasons: Landscapes of Knowledge among the Bribri of Costa Rica. In Ethno-ornithology: Peoples, Culture and Society, edited by S. Tidemann and A. Gosler, pp. 291–300. Earthscan Ltd, London, England.
Sault, N. 2016. How Hummingbird and Vulture Mediate Between Life and Death In Latin America. Journal of Ethnobiology 36:783–806. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-36.4.783.
Sotíl Galindo, R. 2008. Iconografia de la Cultura Nasca. Lima, Perú. Universidad Alas Peruanas. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2641288. Accessed on May 6, 2017.
Sullivan, C. 2012. The State of Zapotec Poetry: Can Poetry Save an Endangered Culture? World Literature Today. Available at: https://www.worldliteraturetoday.org/2012/january/state-zapotec-poetry-can-poetry-save-endangered-culture. Accessed on September 22, 2019.
Tideman, S., S. Chirgwin, and J. R. Sinclair. 2010. Indigenous Knowledges, Birds that Have ‘Spoken’ and Science. In Ethno-ornithology: Birds, Indigenous Peoples, Culture and Society, edited by S. Tideman and A. Gosler, pp. 3–12. Earthscan, London, England.
Wyndham, F., K. Park, and J. Fanshawe. 2018. “Listen Carefully to the Voices of the Birds”: A Comparative Review of Birds as Signs. Journal of Ethnobiology 38:535–549. DOI:10.2993/0278-0771-38.4.533.
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicole Sault
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their content and grant Ethnobiology Letters (the “Journal”) and the Society of Ethnobiology right of first publication. Authors and the Journal agree that Ethnobiology Letters will publish the article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits others to use, distribute, and reproduce the work non-commercially, provided the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
For any reuse or redistribution of a work, users must make clear the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
In publishing with Ethnobiology Letters corresponding authors certify that they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements. They warrant, on behalf of themselves and their co-authors, that the content is original, has not been formally published, is not under consideration, and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights. They further warrant that the material contains no matter that is scandalous, obscene, libelous, or otherwise contrary to the law.
Corresponding authors will be given an opportunity to read and correct edited proofs, but if they fail to return such corrections by the date set by the editors, production and publication may proceed without the authors’ approval of the edited proofs.
